Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Radio\s+IC7600\s+vs\s+IC700\s+vs\s+FT5000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Radio\s+IC7600\s+vs\s+IC700\s+vs\s+FT5000\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY Radio IC7600 vs IC700 vs FT5000 (score: 1): Author: "Stein Roar Brobakken" <s-roabr@online.no>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:24:00 +0200; Hi Is there anyone out there which have compared or tested a FT5000 on RTTY ? I know ICOM IC7600 have DUAL peak filter for RTTY, but people complained over too many buttons to touch compared to the P; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00061.html (6,998 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Radio IC7600 vs IC700 vs FT5000 (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:42:43 -0700; Do you have a tough RF environment? (for example, another contester within 1 km of your station?) If so, I would suggest looking at the FT-dx5000. Under such a situation, receive IMD can be a problem; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00063.html (9,956 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Radio IC7600 vs IC700 vs FT5000 (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 01:18:05 +0200; Yes. The plain answer to that question, LA6FJA, is yes. There is the a 3 time pushing actions, just fiddling buttons to enable the TPF with the 250 Hz filter for the 7600 and for the 7700. To move fr; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-04/msg00068.html (11,011 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]