Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Roundup\s+\-\s+PSK\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Roundup\s+\-\s+PSK\s+\?\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Mintz" <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:50:27 -0500; I am curious from a discussion I had earlier today about the use of PSK in RTTY Roundup. Specifically..... (1) Will you operate PSK31 in the Roundup? (2) and if so, will you ALSO operate RTTY? Rick W; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00199.html (6,488 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:14:18 -0600; (1) No (2) Moot Clint - W5CPT I am curious from a discussion I had earlier today about the use of PSK in RTTY Roundup. Specifically..... (1) Will you operate PSK31 in the Roundup? (2) and if so, will; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00200.html (7,507 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:19:52 -0600; It's my opinion that PSK is a waste of time in the Roundup. I would guess that 95-98% of the action is on RTTY. That's why it's the RTTY Roundup and not the Digital Roundup I guess. 73, Don AA5AU htt; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00201.html (7,692 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "Duane Budd" <dcbudd@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:07:51 -0500; Amen, brother........ 73 Duane Budd, W5BEN dcbudd@embarqmail.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtt; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00210.html (7,206 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:22:41 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Please don't give 'em any ideas. (shudder) No PSK here, RTTY only. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00211.html (7,379 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:01:38 -0500; The name of the Contest - "RTTY Roundup" - says RTTY, does not mention PSK, SSTV, or other digital modes. I do not see here a subject to discuss... 73's Andrei NP3D/W1 See you in ARRL Roundup 2008 fr; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00212.html (9,089 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "Andrew O'Brien" <andrewobrie@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:28:59 -0500; PSK31 has been permitted in the past. As in this item from the 2007 contest page at the ARRL "his is the first effort by the WMR Contest Club in the RTTY Roundup. We operated both RTTY and PSK. The W; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00213.html (8,516 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:33:47 -0500; This was a mistake. Or, they should have changed the name of the Contest. I did not hear that someoone operated CW in CQ WW SSB Contest or otherwise. 2007/12/29, Andrew O'Brien <andrewobrie@gmail.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00214.html (9,463 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "Andrew O'Brien" <andrewobrie@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:34:57 -0500; You are wrong, Sir. "# Object: Amateurs worldwide contact and exchange QSO information with other amateurs using digital modes (Baudot RTTY, ASCII, AMTOR, PSK31, and Packetattended operation only) on; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00215.html (10,498 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:36:14 +0000; I operated PSK when it was first introduced to the Roundup and won the Editor's plaque 2 years in a row for high PSK score (2000 and 2001.) IIRC, I worked about 200 stations, many of whom were not in; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00216.html (9,705 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:43:00 -0800; Definitely. You can ask Barry (UP! UP!), who breezed away with the first PSK plaque. 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00217.html (8,224 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:49:43 -0800; Whoops, I just saw this posting by Barry after sending my previous message. When there is no polar or trans-equatorial flutter, PSK31 beats RTTY by about 6 dB in terms of SNR. I was one of the people; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00218.html (8,378 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up3@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:59:06 +0000; Yes I did, John. Just cuz I was loud didn't mean everyone calling me was loud. I've always said the HP guys should get extra points for working the QRPers. We're the ones doing the hard work, trying; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00219.html (9,001 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: Wayne / AA9DY <aa9dy@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:15:54 -0600; (1) NO. I'm 100% RTTY for this one. PSK exchanges seem to be too slow, and the contest is a "RTTY" Round Up. I didn't see PSK in the title of the contest. Or did I miss something? I don't know why th; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00221.html (9,385 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:49:51 -0500; "Weakest of the weak"..... Uh, Barry, I seem to remember that you operated PSK ....using 1000W! ;-) Sorry, couldn't resist! 73, John WA9ALS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailin; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00223.html (8,523 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Roundup - PSK ?? (score: 1): Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anders@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 07:35:19 -0600; Wayne, Try the EU PSK63 contest. I jumped in to try and work 100 for dxcc(came up 20 short). It's fast. I think we use to have a 100wpm rtty sprint? Problem I see is most PSK ops over drive the audio; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00232.html (10,556 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]