Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Skimmer\s+Server\s+computer\s+hardware\s+needed\s+to\s+handle\s+WPX\s+without\s+throttling\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Skimmer\s+Server\s+computer\s+hardware\s+needed\s+to\s+handle\s+WPX\s+without\s+throttling\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer Server computer hardware needed to handle WPX without throttling (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:50:01 -0600; I ran Alexs RTTY Skimmer Server over the WPX contest weekend and had a tough time decoding multiple bands without throttling, even though the PC it was running on is pretty stout. If you ran RTTY Ski; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00112.html (7,036 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer Server computer hardware needed to handle WPX without throttling (score: 1): Author: Dai NAGAKURA <ndai@cameo.plala.or.jp>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:25:03 +0900; de JF2IWL I use Core i-7 2700k(3.4GHz) ,SSD128GB memory=16GB Win7 pro 64bit for running 5 bands CW and RTTY Skimmer simultaneously. In WPX RTTY, although sometimes it shows yellow flag of CPU load an; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00114.html (8,731 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer Server computer hardware needed to handle WPX without throttling (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:44:13 -0500; Hi Jeff. For whatever it is worth, here's what I did this weekend. I'm running an AMD FX8350 (passmark 9000+) with 8 GB of RAM. 1. turned off CW skimming for the weekend. 2. Set up low band and high; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00117.html (9,837 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer Server computer hardware needed to handle WPX without throttling (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:47:48 -0600; Pete, thanks for the comments. On my AMD 945 (3750 passmark), I could see about 350 decoders max. On two bands at 96 Khz, there were around 600 signals. If that's representative, it's fair to assume; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00124.html (12,251 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer Server computer hardware needed to handle WPX without throttling (score: 1): Author: Mark n2qt <n2qt.va@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:44:19 -0400; I have a setup similar to n4zr, AMD 8350 8 core cpu. Running concurrent cw/RTTY over 7 96khz bands it would max out at about 320 decoders. It always showed 100% decode on cw. There seems to be an adv; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00128.html (13,764 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]