Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Sweeps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Sweeps\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: "Rick Mintz" <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:17:03 -0400; Hi Bill, Not to contest (good choice of words) your opinion but as a clarification.... (1) Sweeps is a 24 hour contest (2) The are many US only contests now, so it is not unique to exclude DX (3) RTT; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00200.html (8,296 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:41:06 -0500; I understand that Sweeps is a 24 hour contest. But it still chews up the weekend. Realistically, another major contest can not coexist in the same 'basic' timeframe as sweeps. I really don't see the; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00205.html (10,467 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:10:40 -0500; But that *is* ARRL November Sweeps - Serial number, "precedence" (entry class), "check" (last two digits of year first licensed), your call, ARRL/RAC section ... Different from about everything else; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00207.html (8,259 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: "Rick Mintz" <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:28:30 -0400; I guess that I will answer your well considered points in order.... A 4:00pm (ET) start does not necessarily mess up a weekend. If it does, it is only by our choice to participate. Obviously to compe; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00210.html (13,006 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:34:16 -0500; yes Sweeps has those components, but I don't feel they will fare well in rtty. Especially if the intent is to include low power, antenna challenged participation. I had trouble printing some high pow; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00211.html (9,582 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Waldemar DK3VN <dk3vn@nexgo.de>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:58:33 +0200; Hi Rick, out of the "WA7BNM 13-Month Contest Calendar" ARRL Sweepstakes Contest, CW 2100Z, Nov 6 to 0300Z, Nov 8 That are 48 hours. There is no 24h pause on Sunday Nov 7, just to celebrate my birthda; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00212.html (9,700 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:45:05 -0500; Actually, it's 30 hours. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train! "They that can give up essential Liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00213.html (7,976 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:05:28 -0700; As is RTTY Roundup. Actually both are 24 out of 30 hours. 2) The are many US only contests now, so it is not unique to exclude DX RTTY contest tradition is that we enjoy working our friends around th; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00214.html (8,859 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:16:41 -0500; Well maybe I am using "old" math, but I get 30 hours out of that. Not meaning to nitpick. Maybe a 80-40-20 format or ??? Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when e; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00216.html (10,880 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:18:43 -0400; Actually CW and Phone SS is a 30 hour contest, of which you're allowed a maximum of 24. So there is a lot of strategy involved in deciding break time if you're going for the gold. I think the biggest; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00217.html (10,587 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:37:35 -0400; 30 hours. You can only operate 24 hours. SS has some unique rules. You work stations once, which tends to make it harder even for big guns to just sit an call CQ all weekend. There are a limited numb; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00218.html (8,904 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:26:18 -0400; All this talk wishing there was a North American RTTY contest that low power stations could be competitive in, and not one mention of the NAQP RTTY? Is everyone suffering from amnesia? 73, Rich VE3IA; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00220.html (7,671 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:27:40 -0400; NAQP and SS are very different. NAQP is much shorter, and has a multiplier-passing strategy. SS is more rate-oriented, with a limited number of multipliers and a rule that says you work stations once; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00221.html (8,078 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Robert Ruvolo <ki6dy@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:20:26 -0700 (PDT); And therein could lie the problem with a RTTY Sweepstakes if it were to follow the rules of the SSB and CW. Although RTTY contesting activity has grown, I don't think it has grown to the extent that; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00222.html (9,412 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:09:07 -0400; Richard Ferch wrote: "All this talk wishing there was a North American RTTY contest that low power stations could be competitive in, and not one mention of the NAQP RTTY? Is everyone suffering from a; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00226.html (7,800 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Sweeps (score: 1): Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:55:10 -0400; As further support for Bob's point, note that many of the contests that support all three modes vary their rules between CW/SSB and RTTY in recognition of the different size of the community: WAE (ev; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-09/msg00229.html (9,497 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]