Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+is\s+getting\s+lower\s+and\s+lower\s+in\s+frequency\s+on\s+20meters\.\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: DJ3IW G&ouml;tz <goetzlin@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:45:05 -0000
It's a major world-wide contest like many of the CW and SSB variety and the numbers of RTTY ops is increasing. That's why. Bandplanners like to neglect the steadily increasing RTTY community. 73 de G
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00098.html (8,130 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: "Gary McAdams" <g.m.mcadams@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:01:49 -0800
Tom, Ok, the first part of your message made sense... But what the heck does the second sentence mean in today's context? There are no NCG's (no code generals) on 20 meters yet. That won't happen unt
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00099.html (8,872 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: Graham Ridgeway <m5aav@btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:08:25 +0000
Not only lower, Tom......I worked several stations above 14.135 What I will say was that in my excursions 'across the band' Here at least 14.069 to 14.072 was clear of RTTY and the PSKers were acklin
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00100.html (7,672 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:58:36 -0500
I think K5NZ was down on 14050 at one point. I had trouble working KB6TAL/M in Irion Cty, TX on 14.0565 but made it despite the RTTY QRM. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00109.html (7,894 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:19:31 -0800
At one point this morning (Sunday) the band from almost 14050 to almost 14150 was chock full of RTTY signals. That should be exciting to ANY HAM! 73 - jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai jds@twistedoak.com Twist
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00131.html (7,936 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:29:59 -0000
Well shoot, I was hoping to get on Saturday afternoon and at least pass out KW9N as a multi, but hopefully there was another KW9 on the bands. My problem was when I went to transmit with WriteLog/MMT
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00132.html (10,045 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:05:04 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- A good part of the PSK problem is the use of the waterfall tuning system. The PSK'ers open up their receivers as wide as possible and then wonder why one loud RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00180.html (8,942 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:42:27 -0500
Bill, you paint with a broad brush. Many of us who enjoy PSK31 *do* sometimes run with wide bandwidths, but we understand AGC and dynamic range as well as you do, thank you very much. And we're not w
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00181.html (9,257 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:26:34 -0500
I'm not sure that's it. PSK is an audio AFSK system. If your rig is in USB, using the stock SSB filters (1.8 or 2.4 KHz or wider), and there is no way to narrow the bandwidth (tunable PBT), you're st
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00233.html (9,130 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:51:07 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Well, SOMEBODY out there is whining! I guarantee you if anyone fires up with 1500 watts of RTTY on 14071, the complaints will be loud and clear, and that's a dir
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00248.html (9,515 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:37:58 -0500
Gosh, this last weekend during the ARRL CW, the CW operators were all the way through 14.080 and beyond. I worked some DX as high as 14.130! I guess that the CW operators don't respect anyone.... (<g
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00350.html (9,239 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:43:10 -0500
7030 kHz is about right for the bottom end of the Region 1 RTTY subband. Remember, not everyone in the world has 300 kHz on 40m. Most of the world only has 100 kHz. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail:
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00351.html (9,130 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: "TF3TTY" <tf3tty@internet.is>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:31:23 -0000
Hi All I tried to do some sstv on 14.230khz, during the weekend but the cw contester's where there too. 73's de tf3tty --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@cont
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00352.html (9,727 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20meters. (score: 1)
Author: "Glenn VA3DX" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:57:05 -0500
Geez , when you try to travel by car on a holiday weekend and the highways are clogged with cars , who do blame ?? There are SSB CW RTTY PSK31 etc etc contests , some are more popular than others and
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00353.html (11,003 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu