Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+qso\s+rate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+qso\s+rate\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY qso rate (score: 1): Author: "K3MQ - Bob Johnson" <k3mq@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:39:10 -0400; I'm fairly new to RTTY contesting, and am just wodering what a "decent" qso rate would be in the CQWW. Obviously, there are many, many variables, but let's say the op is using a single radio, has a m; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00029.html (6,771 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY qso rate (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT); Take whatever AA5AU or W2UP says, and divide by 2. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C/0, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00033.html (7,060 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY qso rate (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:55:56 +0100; Hi Bob, As you rightly said, there are many variables. Rate is good, but it is NOT the bee all and end all of it. Don't forget the mults! Some may come to you, but some won't, and you will have to go; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00037.html (9,519 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY qso rate (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:44:24 -0500; Bob, you didn't mention you were in Delaware (I know because I have your call memorized as being in DE) which, by itself, is worth more Q's per hour than say NY or PA in some cases. Being from an ext; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00042.html (9,407 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY qso rate (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:46:13 -0500; Actually, Mike K4GMH, would be a good one to contribute on this because he ran SO1R high power for many years from the east coast. 73, Don AA5AU http://www.aa5au.com http://www.rttycontesting.com Tak; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00043.html (7,973 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY qso rate (score: 1): Author: "K3MQ - Bob Johnson" <k3mq@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:25:33 -0400; Thanks to all for some really useful information. If anyone has more words of wisdom on contesting for for a rookie, I'm all ears. I hope to see everyone in the contest. 73, Bob K3MQ ________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00045.html (7,360 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY qso rate (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:20:59 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Operating SO1R from the West Coast, I consider 100/hour to be pretty good, although I don't think I've ever sustained that for a full hour. I recall some momenta; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00054.html (7,720 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]