Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+skimmer\s+observations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+skimmer\s+observations\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY skimmer observations (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:52:10 +0000; I was seeing a lot more RTTY (DL4RCK) skimmer spots this past weekend during the test, and that was a good thing. I was spotted more that 100 times in my runs. I entered as "assisted" aka "unlimited"; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00031.html (7,842 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY skimmer observations (score: 1): Author: Wes Cosand <wz7i@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:57:04 -0500; am certainly motivated to find solutions to these issues. I thought I had a definitive way of calibrating my spot frequency but it obviously isn't working. I will spend some time this week looking a; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00033.html (7,777 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY skimmer observations (score: 1): Author: "John Holmes" <w9ily@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 13:14:38 -0600; Wes, thanks a lot for your research into this. I noticed that your spots were much closer on 40M and, as was previously posted, the 20M and 15M spots were off by about 400 Hz. Thanks! 73 from the VER; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00055.html (8,669 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]