Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+\[WriteLog\]\s+\[TCG\]\s+RTTY\s+Sprint\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+\[WriteLog\]\s+\[TCG\]\s+RTTY\s+Sprint\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re: [WriteLog] [TCG] RTTY Sprint (score: 1): Author: rruvolo@earthlink.net (Robert Ruvolo); Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 18:20:56 -0500; I can't find any reference in the rules that states we must be limited to 100 watts. Perhaps Larry is confused with NAQP in July. Am I missing something here??? Bob (KI6DY); /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00166.html (7,312 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Re: [WriteLog] [TCG] RTTY Sprint (score: 1): Author: w0etc@ix.netcom.com (Larry Lindblom); Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:39:05 -0000; Looks like they changed the rules. I'll swear on a stack on New RTTY Journals the up till the last running the power was limited to 100 watts input. Can anyone back me up on this. 73 and duping; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00167.html (7,906 bytes)
3. [RTTY] Re: [WriteLog] [TCG] RTTY Sprint (score: 1): Author: k7wm@i10net.com (k7wm); Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 05:07:34 -0000; Hi Bob..The rules are ambiguous and are in the process of being straightened out. For the present, run what you want for the one this coming Saturday evening but hopefully will have a high and low po; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00177.html (8,371 bytes)
4. [RTTY] Re: [WriteLog] [TCG] RTTY Sprint (score: 1): Author: k7wm@i10net.com (k7wm); Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 05:12:44 -0000; They got changed and published over several modifications due to incorporation into the cw/sprints. (along with several of the cw/ssb rules)..They are being brought back to original specs but for thi; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00178.html (9,082 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]