Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+JARTS\s+log\s+submission\s+format\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+JARTS\s+log\s+submission\s+format\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re: JARTS log submission format (score: 1): Author: Walt Niemczura <walt@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:48:13 -1000; Hi Gang, I don't understand all this traffic concerning the log format for the JARTS contest. This was posted by Maza last February to this reflector: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-10/msg00195.html (7,675 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Re: JARTS log submission format (score: 1): Author: Waldemar DK3VN <dk3vn@nexgo.de>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:28:12 +0200; Hi, ** BINGO! ** RTFR = Read The (Fu..) Fine Rules! ~:) 73 de Waldemar, DK3VN -- Check RWRL on http://home.arcor.de/waldemar.kebsch RWRL Mirror on http://www.qsl.net/dk3vn mailto:dk3vn@darc.de German; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-10/msg00197.html (8,471 bytes)
3. RE: [RTTY] Re: JARTS log submission format (score: 1): Author: "Don Cassel" <doncassel@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:09:03 -0400; It is also my recollection that it was stated some time ago that Cabrillo would be the mandatory form of log submission for the JARTS contest. From my viewpoint though, the real issue is that the log; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-10/msg00198.html (10,995 bytes)
4. RE: [RTTY] Re: JARTS log submission format (score: 1): Author: "Mike Mellinger WA0SXV" <wa0sxv@mellinger.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:41:10 -0500; All of which speaks to the ugliness of a "standard" format like Cabrillo that has to be customized for every contest. 73, Mike WA0SXV It is also my recollection that it was stated some time ago that; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-10/msg00202.html (10,497 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]