Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\s+the\s+OK\s+Cabrillo\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\s+the\s+OK\s+Cabrillo\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re the OK Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:06 -0000; Hi all, Yes, I know the rules state that they want logs per band, but I am fairly sure that I submitted a Cabrillo log last year as well. Also, WL 10.55D did generate a Cabrillo log, but 10.61 will n; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00091.html (6,780 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Re the OK Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Graham Ridgeway <m5aav@btinternet.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:32:37 +0000; Does anyone know if they use a robot with auto responses, or does one wait for a human to acknowledge a log submission ?? 73 Graham M5AAV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00093.html (6,896 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Re the OK Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - KØRC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:02:05 -0600; I believe the logs are manually acknowledged. This morning I received this 3-line message: This doesn't look like a robot to me. I was looking forward to the OK RTTY contest but the propagation forec; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00097.html (9,841 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Re the OK Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:54:51 -0500; Robert Chudek - KØRC wrote: " I will say that some of you guys were "intimidating" on the receiving end. What I mean by this is, even though I'm a seasoned RTTY operator, using totally differe; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-12/msg00098.html (8,022 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]