Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SAVERTTY\.com\s+down\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SAVERTTY\.com\s+down\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] SAVERTTY.com down? (score: 1): Author: Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM <wb2rhm@wb2rhm.com>; Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 16:30:28 -0400; IS anyone else getting can't connect, or reset connection when trying to view savecw or savertty?? 73, Ben - WB2RHM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.c; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00174.html (6,933 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] SAVERTTY.com down? (score: 1): Author: N5sjs via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 16:36:47 -0400 (EDT); It comes up okay here,using Firefox. David IS anyone else getting can't connect, or reset connection when trying to view savecw or savertty?? 73, Ben - WB2RHM ________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00175.html (7,251 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] SAVERTTY.com down? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 16:57:09 -0400; The connection is alive but apparently the software crashed. Don't know when the person who has the box will be able to get back (was out of town for a few days) and restart it. 73, ... Joe, W4TV 73,; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00176.html (7,320 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] SAVERTTY.com down? (score: 1): Author: COURYHOUSE--- via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 23:10:16 -0400 (EDT); can not get it here with any browser Ed# In a message dated 5/25/2014 1:37:02 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, rtty@contesting.com writes: It comes up okay here,using Firefox. David IS anyone else get; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00180.html (8,015 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] SAVERTTY.com down? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 10:46:38 -0400; It's up again this morning. Keep up the fight ... Remember - the reason ARRL gives for RM-11708 that it protects against even wider modes is proven false by the removal of the 300 baud limit. There i; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00184.html (9,531 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]