Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO2R\,\s+small\s+lot\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO2R\,\s+small\s+lot\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1): Author: Chris <frisco.kid@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:46:13 -0500; Since it appears we are short of dead horses, how about a technical question. If quality filters (and or stubs) are used, what have others experienced as minimum speration distance of a beam at 40ft; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00448.html (6,726 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:03:12 +0000; I recommend you actually measure the RF voltage coming back on the "other" coax. A few years ago I jerry-rigged a RF probe for my DVM and made some measurements. I wanted to make sure RF voltages wer; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00456.html (7,874 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:34:23 -0700; Hi Jerry et al I have seen the meter on the antenna tuner on the 2nd radio deflect when transmitting on radio 1. It wiggles a little if I am using the amplifier. I assume that must be RF coming back; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00474.html (7,356 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:44:07 +0000; Don't know - but it is really easy to measure. I would assume if your RF voltage is less than the voltage required to damage a transistor, you would be OK. I don't know that exact level, but I would; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00475.html (8,106 bytes)
5. [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1): Author: <montemerlo@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:08:13 -0500 (CDT); Whats the problem at 100Watts..... My lot is 50x150 feet. A 60 foot tower with an M2 Log Periodic is house attached in back. 50 feet from it on a hill is a vertical SteppIR. The end of the LPA is abo; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00483.html (7,549 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:45:29 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- A little OT, but I was once mobiling on 40 meters and waiting at a red light behind a police car. I saw him key his mike and every time he did, my SWR meter in; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00491.html (8,054 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Jonsson" <tf3tty@internet.is>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:02:18 -0000; Hi. I was monitoring 14.345 mhz in a rtty contest on my radio when the contest station was sending using 350 watts, My radio died. And the fuse blew. It was too expensive to fix it so I got me a new; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00500.html (8,713 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 15:24:51 -0400; Sorry to reply to an old thread. I don't know about 40 feet, but I've been successful at running a limited SO2R on phone with a tribander and vertical separated by 120 feet with NO filters at all and; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00009.html (7,909 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot? (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:37:10 +0000; I run 1 tower SO2R. With stubs and bandpass filters 100 W is no problem at all. I usually run high power and only have problems with 2nd harmonics +/- 10-15 KHz. I used a vertical for the second radi; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00010.html (8,535 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]