Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ST0R\s+RTTY\s+Statistics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ST0R\s+RTTY\s+Statistics\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:33:58 -0500; Congrats to the ST0R team for their excellent effort to make sure most of us got into the log on RTTY. They made 18,132 RTTY contacts which came to 15% of all QSOs they made. This is pretty impressiv; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00130.html (6,792 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:43:27 -0500; Oh, they're done. Explains why I didn't see them spotted last night CDT. :-) My *only* QSO with them was on 17 RTTY (not "Digital") so I, too, am glad they made so many contacts in that mode! I think; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00133.html (7,032 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:12:00 -0600; Agreed! They were pretty easy to work especially near the very end. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00134.html (8,136 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:02:53 -0400; While this is encouraging, it is still well short of approximately 25% of QSOs that I would expect for an expedition that treated RTTY as an equal to CW and Phone modes. As it is, 45% of ST0R's QSOs; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00137.html (8,608 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:09:37 -0700; I suspect this will improve as DXpeditions adopt better tuning techniques for RTTY. IMHO. With CW, you can listen for signals and decode a signal that are a full kHz away (guys like N5KO use the filt; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00138.html (12,251 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:36:21 -0700; By the way, something I did not mention is use of a wideband waterfall or skimmer to collect multiple callsigns after a single QRZ or CQ. You can work a series of stations in a sequence and reduce th; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00139.html (7,959 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:53:01 -0400; The "skimmer like" techniques are there already .... see the video from CE0Y/I2DMI - http://www.mdxc.org/ce0yi2dmi/ using microKEYER II with N1MM Logger/MMVARI in "DXpedition mode" for Windows or the; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00140.html (15,000 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: Terry Dunlap <terry@kk6t.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:45:07 -0700; Wow, the video is amazing. I had no idea this was available. I can't wait to try it out myself. If I knew the DX was using "skimmer like" techniques, I would be much less apt to jump around, looking; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00141.html (16,436 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: Doug Hall <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:21:53 -0400; You have probably spent more time on the other end of a DX pileup than I have, and I've never operated from a location like ST0R. But in my limited experience operating from DX locations I have never; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00142.html (8,888 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:51:55 -0700; If you search the reflector archives, I had alerted everyone about this before 9X0TL went live, and mentioned that for the 9X0YL piles, you should look for a spectrum hole to transmit instead of chas; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00143.html (10,659 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:42:48 +0200; Hi all. BTW also FLDIGI does the same as I2DMI, Francesco, showed us with MMVARI. It seems a little bit more hard to set by levels and, well, squelch .... still inside N1MM. I have the hope that this; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00144.html (8,751 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:00:16 -0700 (PDT); I agree with Doug that the ST0R operation was definitely RTTY-friendly. Toward the end they showed up on 12 and 40 meter RTTY (they did operate 12M RTTY early for Europe). The operation on 12 was v; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00145.html (11,957 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:23:17 -0600; Percentages of contacts made means nothing unless you know the finite amount of RTTY, CW and SSB ops. That 28 percent of rtty contacts might be working 80 percent or more of the active and more serio; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00147.html (13,112 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] ST0R RTTY Statistics (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:40:47 -0400; I did RTTY from XV this year and it was interesting. I was running with MMTTY. The signal display often looked like a DC signal on a scope with a slight ripple for several kHz making the display near; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00150.html (15,190 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]