Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Super\s+Check\s+Partial\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Super\s+Check\s+Partial\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Super Check Partial (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:12:11 -0800; For those of you that use SCP (Super Check Partial) and choose to use the RTTY-only version, what is your reason for not using the full version that includes calls from contests of all three modes? E; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00021.html (7,260 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Super Check Partial (score: 1): Author: DONALD A HILL <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:19:11 -0800 (PST); I used to notice that running a large SCP file would slow down my Win98 machine. But since both machines are now XP, I doubt I would have that problem. I think the problem with using an SCP file with; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00022.html (7,817 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Super Check Partial (score: 1): Author: James Colville <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:23:59 -0800; Because some of us only operate rtty contests. 73 Jim w7ry For those of you that use SCP (Super Check Partial) and choose to use the RTTY-only version, what is your reason for not using the full vers; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00025.html (7,575 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Super Check Partial (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:57:27 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I agree with Don's logic here, but I use the all-calls file anyway because I figure there are at least some contesters who have done SSB or CW and are now doing their first R; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00027.html (8,175 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Super Check Partial (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:29:54 -0800; Hi all, Like others, I stick with the RTTY-only version of the SCP, as I don't wish to get partial calls confused by non-RTTY callsigns. It is bad enough when Writelog decides to only highlight part; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00029.html (7,645 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Super Check Partial (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:03:53 -0700; Yes but contesters are participating more and more in RTTY so why wait for an update to the RTTY database when most of the new players are already in a general version. CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00030.html (8,901 bytes)
7. [RTTY] Super Check Partial (score: 1): Author: "k0bx@arrl.net" <k0bx@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:24:53 -0800 (PST); I think that maybe we are forgetting about history? In Windows98 there was a problem with the array size. So I think the Super Check Partial file was split out for rtty. I maybe wrong. But in Wind; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-03/msg00031.html (9,994 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]