Author: Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM <wb2rhm@wb2rhm.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:13:51 -0500
All, I'm appalled that we are misguided fools.... we have mistaken benevolence for threat........ The Empire has issue the definitive rebuttal to all our foolishness: http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-re
I particularly like this comment: "The ARRL further asserted that the fear of interference from automatically controlled stations "is not a valid one." Yeah, right! Don AA5AU All, I'm appalled that w
Well, at this point maybe the thing to do is for the ARRL to withdraw RM-11708. Allowing the involved parties to resolve their fundamental misunderstanding of the real intentions of RM-11708. I'm sur
So many logical fallacies in this but my favorite: "..the ARRL said comments opposed to its initiative reflect a fundamental misunderstanding.." Clearly if you oppose this you are clueless. Further:
Sorry, redone with the right subject, maybe a senior moment ... desolè. HI Ben, it seems that they play and sing their song by their self. Non a single tech reason, not a single suggestion just a "do
"Instead, the League said, its Petition is intended to impose a limitation on the maximum bandwidth of data emissions where none exists now. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Aubrey W70
Obviously K1ZZ wasn't operating in RTTY RU! Talk about high handed dictatorial nonsense. At least I delayed my Reply Comment long enough to see and respond to this nonsense. We'll see if ARRL tries t
The league keeps issuing these PR releases which is telling in the number and the verbiage they are using. I really cannot understand what the benefit to the league or it's membership is in this freq
I have no idea if Dave was or wasn't this year, Joe. But he beat *YOUR *2013 score by 42,824%. Do you actually enter contests ? Can't seem to find your call in CQWW RTTY database either; nor WW RTTY
Dave was in the contest. Had him in the KP2D log for two bands. 73 Ron KP2N I have no idea if Dave was or wasn't this year, Joe. But he beat *YOUR *2013 score by 42,824%. Do you actually enter contes
I particularly liked this part: "The counterproposals contained in some opposing comments of a 1 kilohertz or a 2.2 kilohertz limit are intended to preclude most data emissions at MF and HF. They are
actually, to be fair, I did work k1zz later in RU however,,, I despise the high handed, "we are right, shut up and sit down serfs" attitude that has been displayed. all to often by the leadership. th
Author: Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM <wb2rhm@wb2rhm.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:20:29 -0500
Joe Subich, W4TV Tue Jan 7 17:37:10 EST 2014 Obviously K1ZZ wasn't operating in RTTY RU! Talk about high handed dictatorial nonsense. At least I delayed my Reply Comment long enough to see and respon
If he was, the PACTOR goons apparently did not bother him. Yes, I worked a few DX stations for CQ Marathon and listened to the PACTOR II/PACTOR III QRM of US and domestic contest operations above 140
What's really galling to me is that I know (because you've stated publicly) you have lobbied the head hired-hand. Your technical competence should be unquestioned by anyone in the ARRL hierarchy (whe
Actually K1ZZ did operate RTTY Roundup and was quite active. I worked him on 15 and 20 meters and even found him running a frequency or two. Both times I worked him, he called me and it took everythi
Au contraire. K1ZZ is in my ARRL RTTY RU log @ 23:14z on Sunday. He was running on 20m. I heard him several times during the day. 73 James K1SD _______________________________________________ RTTY ma
Au contraire. K1ZZ is in my ARRL RTTY RU log @ 23:14z on Sunday. He was running on 20m. I heard him several times during the day. 73 James K1SD == == Message: 2 Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 17:37:10 -0500
In which case I find it even more unbelievable that ARRL's Reply to Comments can claim there is no present or future interference problem between automatically operated wide bandwidth stations and tr