Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Two\s+CQWW\s+observations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Two\s+CQWW\s+observations\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Two CQWW observations (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:39:18 -0700; Two observations from the CQWW RTTY this past weekend: 1. The VE3NEA RTTY Skimmers have definitely come of age! I saw very few instances of non-cq'ers being spotted, and hardly any busted calls. Than; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00074.html (7,657 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Two CQWW observations (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 18:52:56 -0400; no busted calls ?!?!?!?! You must not have been seeing the K1TTT spots.....it started out good, but by late Saturday night into Sunday, it was dropping the first letter on many spots.... Two observat; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00075.html (7,908 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Two CQWW observations (score: 1): Author: Mark Schoonover <mark@ka6wke.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:57:50 -0700; It was rough conditions for me near San Diego. Could hear them just couldn't work many. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00076.html (9,444 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Two CQWW observations (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:20:39 -0700; I was connected the AE5E-2 node, which runs CC-Cluster software. I think the CC-cluster nodes do some RBN spot quality-checking, and they work perfectly with CC-User program filtering. I also had spo; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00077.html (9,450 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Two CQWW observations (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 19:26:00 -0400; we were connected to an AR vr 6 cluster, and and some extensive filtering...I know there is a command (not in front of me now, maybe noskimmer -b (for bad)) to eliminate the known bad spots....we had; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00078.html (10,273 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Two CQWW observations (score: 1): Author: "Jim" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:32:42 -0500; Agreed! Lots of mult spots that were not on the spotted frequency. Lots of busted calls as well. 73 Jim W7RY no busted calls ?!?!?!?! You must not have been seeing the K1TTT spots.....it started out; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00134.html (9,604 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Two CQWW observations (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:32:07 -0700; It sounds to me like the CC-Cluster quality checks are catching all of these bad spots before I see them. You guys who are having trouble should give it a try. Use a CC-Cluster as your connection nod; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-09/msg00136.html (10,862 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]