Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+W1AW\/0\s+Kansas\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+W1AW\/0\s+Kansas\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] W1AW/0 Kansas?? (score: 1): Author: joeduerbusch <k0bx@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:09:58 +0000; I wonder if anyone has receive a LOTW for the RTTY QSO's for Kansas for W1AW/0? Did I miss something? It is the last one I need for Cent. WAS. Joe K0BX -- Honor Roll RTTY 5BWAS Stop the insanity! Ple; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00034.html (7,014 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 Kansas?? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:27:42 -0800; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I have about 20 or so from the 11/5 operation, and none of them appear in LotW. Seems they are just slow in getting them uploaded. K0RU is the honcho for; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00035.html (6,918 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 Kansas?? (score: 1): Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:10:01 -0800; Joe, According to the Cent. QSO Party web page, the November Kansas operation has not been uploaded yet. 73, Jim N6VH Joe K0BX _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@c; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00036.html (7,202 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 Kansas?? (score: 1): Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:27:50 -0600; Joe, I have Kansas confirmed on 20 and 40 meters worked February 27th. Those are the only 2 so far. Dick KS0M "Life isn't about how to survive the storm, but how to dance in the rain" Richard C. (Dic; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00037.html (8,178 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 Kansas?? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 23:27:36 -0600; K0RU told me it would be Jan approx before those are loaded. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Joe, I have Kansas confirmed on 20 and 40 meters worked February 27th. Those are the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00039.html (8,908 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 Kansas?? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:56:04 -0500; *TWO MONTHS!* after the operation ... that's absurd! Two weeks is an appropriate time period. If someone can't devote the effort necessary to see that the logs are collected immediately and forwarded; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00040.html (8,888 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 Kansas?? (score: 1): Author: Gary Senesac <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:09:46 -0900; Have to agree with Joe on this one. I have no way of knowing of course, but it sounds to me as if one or more of the KS operators was doing paper logging. Now those paper logs have to be manually ret; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00041.html (10,480 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/0 Kansas?? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 12:26:08 -0500; produce a Cabrillo formatted file within days of the end of operations. Make that ADIF file ... Cabrillo loses too much data and does no have a consistent format from contest to contest. For example,; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-12/msg00042.html (10,745 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]