Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+WAEDC\s+RTTY\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+WAEDC\s+RTTY\s+Contest\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A); Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 01:23:44 -0000; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0032_01C19007.74E52670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I receive WAE QTC for almost 40 yea; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-12/msg00000.html (11,030 bytes)
2. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: ditdah@infogen.net.nz (Frank Hunt); Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 23:53:03 +1300; And so it seems that no skill is required just the the money to buy the software. Maybe this is why we don't need qtc's in a RTTY contest? Frank, ZL2BR; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-11/msg00006.html (6,690 bytes)
3. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:24:02 -0000; That's like saying why bother having contests on more than one band. All you need to do is pay the money to put up enough antennas for 5 bands... QTCs accomplish several things: 1. It goes back to ou; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-11/msg00007.html (8,198 bytes)
4. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:06:34 -0800; I do hope that folks don't take this wrongly if some of us don't devote our full spirit to WAE. Some of our "roots" come from experimenting with finding better means of passing messages, not the act; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-11/msg00010.html (8,405 bytes)
5. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Gerd Uhlig" <dl7vog@snafu.de (Gerd Uhlig); Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:21:38 -0000; Hello all, I agree with Barry about QTCs (as I already stated in former e-mails). Okay on automated QTCs - why not - RTTY can't be done with any keyer or even two "banana plugs". I never heard any gu; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-11/msg00011.html (10,221 bytes)
6. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: k4ww@home.com (Shelby Summerville); Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 15:48:57 -0500; "As far as stressing my traffic handling ability, CW Sweepstakes is enough of a humbling experience" All I can add to that...........AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-11/msg00013.html (6,837 bytes)
7. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: dhill@cprk.com (Hill, Don); Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:23:04 -0600; There were a lot of comments made to the reflector that certain operators would be skipping the WAEDC RTTY Contest because they did not care for the exchange of QTC's. Just because you don't care to; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00378.html (8,094 bytes)
8. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick); Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:47:55 -0600; I agree. WAE is a fun contest and is open to all. When I get a bit tired...I just don't do the QTC thing. But they are fun. Trying to guess which signals will be good enough to pass the qtc's without; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00379.html (9,341 bytes)
9. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: raj@logicresources.com (Raj VE6RAJ); Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:17:41 -0700; Yeah: Just because you don't like QTCs shouldn't keep you out of the test. I am not a QTC expert, but as you can only send QTCs to another continent, here is your chance to inflict your pain back on; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00380.html (8,150 bytes)
10. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: jtolbert@gremlan.org (The Tolberts); Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 19:32:40 -0500; I'd love to try WAE but heres my problem; I'm using MMTTY which of course runs in WIN95; WF1B runs in DOS. I can't, no matter how hard I try get the two to work together. Heres the setup: PC with 6 c; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00381.html (11,486 bytes)
11. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 20:44:23 -0500; Let me join the crowd and say YES, PLEASE OPERATE! I think the QTCs are fun (with WriteLog and good signals!), but I distinctly remember the first time I ever heard of QTCs, just a very short time a; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00383.html (8,323 bytes)
12. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: dk3vn@nexgo.de (Waldemar DK3VN); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:20:54 +0100; Hi, for many HAM's the WAEDC is the most challenging DX contest in the world! I am very surprised to read, that many RRTY OP's, even the "old ones", don't like this contest, because they don't unders; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00386.html (9,774 bytes)
13. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: k4ww@home.com (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 04:55:43 -0500; Waldemar et al. The reasons for one not participating in any event (contest or otherwise) are as varied as the number usually not participating? Personally, the passing of QTC's is not the part that; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00387.html (12,219 bytes)
14. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:09:48 -0000; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_008C_01C1612B.01AEDE90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NO QTC attitude is well known in WA; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00388.html (22,106 bytes)
15. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:03:38 -0500; world! I think QTCs are fun, and am a little disappointed when there's none to exchange. Trepidation seems mostly based on signal quality/QRM and one's software. With good signals, using Writelog to; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00389.html (8,767 bytes)
16. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:44:29 -0000; Even though I haven't operated the WAE in a number of years (due to time constraints), it has been one of my favorites, over the years, because the QTCs made it different than all the others. I even; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00390.html (9,652 bytes)
17. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:34:43 -0800; _________________________________________________________ Hi Waldemar: I understand what a QTC is; I just don't think sending message traffic is fun. That's just my preference. For those who like to; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00391.html (9,410 bytes)
18. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:45:34 -0000; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_010C_01C16151.87EDABF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There is no chance to work DX for 4; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00392.html (14,083 bytes)
19. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: kari.hirvonen@alpha.fi (Kari Hirvonen); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:49:45 +0200; ** Hi fellow Rttyer's, I fully agree with with Bill W7TI, his opinion hits the target. The point is to collect and log as many stations & multis as possible in a limited time. That's so simple.We're; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00393.html (10,827 bytes)
20. [RTTY] WAEDC RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: artinian@siol.net (Marijan Miletic, S56A); Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:31:09 -0000; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_001B_01C16160.47ED4010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit WAE rules will be changed in 2002 u; /archives//html/RTTY/2001-10/msg00394.html (20,037 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]