Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Which\s+filter\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Which\s+filter\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Which Filter? (score: 1): Author: Ed Steeble <esteeble@sc.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:26:04 -0400; I have an ICOM-746 (not the Pro). Which filter should I get for RTTY and RTTY contesting, the 500kc FL-100 or the IC-232 350kc? I am concerned that the 350kc filter may be too sharp. Tnx, Ed K3IXD __; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00071.html (6,794 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Which Filter? (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:40:42 +0000; 350. It is actually possible to use filters as narrow as 250 for 170 shift RTTY (I now use 250 routinely with my 756PRO in RTTY contests). I once had a plain 756 (non-PRO) and used the pass-band tuni; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00072.html (6,966 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Which Filter? (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:59:13 -0400; Ed, I think you'll be happier with the narrower filter. A 350 Hz filter is not too sharp for crowded conditions like a contest. A lot of RTTY contesters routinely use 250 Hz filters. 73, Mike K1MK Mi; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00073.html (7,600 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Which Filter? (score: 1): Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:10:54 -0400; I am using a IC-46 with 500Hz filter in both IF and just ordered a new FL-101 250Hz filter to use on RTTY, yes in contest you need that. On my second radio, a TS-2000 I have DSP filtering and always; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00074.html (7,792 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Which Filter? (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:14:18 -0700 (PDT); In the 756 Pro, the RTTY filter is 350 Hz wide. In my 756 "classic" I purchased a pair of 400 Hz filters from INRAD and was VERY happy with them. I'm not a big fan of narrow (i.e. 250 Hz) filters. I; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00075.html (7,984 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Which Filter? (score: 1): Author: "dsthill" <dsthill@cbcbarbados.bb>; Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:49:15 -0400; Interesting question... I used a pair of 400Hz in a Kenwood TS 850s and I thought this was absolutely the best. Then I acquired a Yaesu FT1Kmp and I started to use the pair of 250Hz filters. Those 25; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00076.html (8,572 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Which Filter? (score: 1): Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:25:00 -0400; Jim, AD1C got a good point. Even if I use the sharp 250Hz on my TS-2000, always, before a RUN I will check the channel with a wider filtering to be sure I am not QRMing or be sure I have a good clear; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00077.html (7,560 bytes)
8. [RTTY] Which filter? (score: 1): Author: Joe Harris <joseph.a.harris@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 23:45:21 -0400; Hi all, I use an ICOM IC-706MKIIG in FSK and I'm getting to the point where I'm participating in RTTY contests enough to justify purchasing a filter. Anyone here have experience with the different fi; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00010.html (6,900 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Which filter? (score: 1): Author: "Stephen M. Shearer" <wb3lgc@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:32:11 -0400; From: http://kv5r.com/articles/ham/706.asp Items 9 and 10: Optional Filters: Set to "No" if you have not purchased optional filters. If you add one filter, I recommend the FL-232 in slot 1, and set t; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00022.html (8,508 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]