Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Why\s+is\s+40\s+Meter\s+contesting\s+in\s+CW\s+segment\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: Gordon Bousman <nw7d.ham@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:55:28 -0800
I'm wondering if it would not make more sense on 40 meters to have RTTY contesting up in the traditional .80 to .100 segment of the band rather down in the 7030 to 7050 CW portion where we have to co
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00034.html (7,070 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 18:59:10 -0900
You can expect some disagreement from AK hams who are authorized to use SSB in the 40M segment from 7.075 to 7.100 Mhz. I believe the authorization was made to accomodate potential emergency use, but
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00035.html (8,884 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: David VE3VID <ve3vid@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 23:19:51 -0500
EU stations would not agree either since that is allocated to phone there also, not to mention other countries right here in NA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00036.html (9,454 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: "G. E. Janssens - K5WW" <k5ww@live.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:57:55 -0700
IARU Region 1's bandplan limits RTTY to well below the segment you mention, Gordon. If we'd go where you suggest then we'd be talking to ourselves most of the time... 73, Erik - K5WW ________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00037.html (10,666 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 09:31:57 +0000 (GMT)
Just noticed these comments about the placement of RTTY on 40 metres. In the UK, our bandplan says that we operate RTTY in the 7030 region. We have been upsetting the QRP CW guys for some time, espec
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00038.html (10,318 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 05:35:03 -0800
The Region 1 bandplan at http://www.iaru-r1.org/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=173&func=startdown&id=67 shows: 7000 - 7040 CW only 7040 - 7050 Digital modes only 7050 - 7200 All modes RTTY co
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00039.html (13,258 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:36:39 +0000
Should have checked my bandplan first!!! Hand before brain again. John is correct of course. However, in "practice" it is somewhat different. Unfortunately the plans are not adhered to rigidly and th
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00040.html (15,445 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 10:06:08 -0500
Since SSB typically requires more than 25 times the bandwidth of a CW signal (100 Hz vs. 2700 Hz), a more "fair" division of the available 200 KHz would be 7000 - 7035 for CW, 7035-7070 for RTTY (da
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00041.html (18,301 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: dj3iw@web.de
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:14:34 +0100 (CET)
And then there is IARU Region 3 with their own bandplan: 7025 - 7040 kHz NB NB: Narrow band modes including CW, RTTY, Packet and modes with similar bandwidth not exceeding 2 kHz. 73, Goetz, DJ3IW ___
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00042.html (7,930 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:33:52 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: A further complication is that JA stations are limited to below 7045. This makes the "sweet spot" fall between 7040-7045, just 5 kHz. 73, Bill W6WRT _________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00047.html (9,154 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 06:38:37 -0800
Actually the basic premise of this entire discussion is quite wrong. It is the CW and the Digital section of the band. It of course does differ from Region to Region but in the US it is both CW and D
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00048.html (9,091 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:50:56 -0800
Telecommunication laws differ in each country and determine what frequencies licensees can transmit on. For example, US hams can use CW or digital from 7000-7125 on 40m. Japanese hams are only allowe
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00049.html (12,182 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:06:44 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: In the US, there is no CW portion of any of the HF contesting bands. CW is allowed anywhere in any of the bands except 60 meters. There IS a RTTY portion, however. 73, Bill W
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00055.html (9,503 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu