Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+XE\s+contest\s+\@\s+75\s+baud\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+XE\s+contest\s+\@\s+75\s+baud\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Russell Blair <russell_blair86@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 10:44:17 -0800 (PST); Well I had 6 or 7 station to try to work me and then left without a contact but only two station did change speed to 75 baud (W6WRT and AB9TA). During the WPX I might do the same thing and see how ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00024.html (6,859 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:09:22 +0000; Hi Russell et al. I did put out a few CQ calls on 75. I had a few replies too, but like you sadly they stayed on 45.5 Bauds so no contact. I shall try a few CQ calls this coming week. Unfortunately I; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00025.html (8,907 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Russell Blair <russell_blair86@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:46:35 -0800 (PST); Yes Roger I will be up at the top of the bands like 14.100 and on 7090 the band will be full during the WPX contest,hopefully we can get a few more contacts. CUL Roger, hope you get the hard drive al; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00026.html (9,943 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:25:04 -0500; Russell Blair wrote: "During the WPX I might do the same thing and see how many will change to 75 baud for a (NC) Prefix." The "prefix" would be "NC5", and there may well not be another, but I can as; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00029.html (7,935 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Russell Blair <russell_blair86@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 12:40:59 -0800 (PST); Thanks for your input. Russell NC5O 1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door! 2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00030.html (8,887 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:00:01 -0500; It would take a lot to change an established tradition. If I am tuning across you in a conventional contest and can't copy your CQ after a couple of tries, I would normally just move on without anoth; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00032.html (9,160 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Russell Blair <russell_blair86@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 13:04:52 -0800 (PST); Thanks Jerry for your input. Russell NC5O 1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door! 2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00033.html (9,738 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:05:28 +0000; Hi Y'all. I think Shelby had a good point regarding trying 75 Bauds in a "normal" contest. This just will not happen. I am only going to try 75 in casual use, chatting etc., until John, GW4SKA organi; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00046.html (12,087 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>; Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 10:28:45 -0500; I agree. One thing is weekly casual operation, a hole different story in a real contest. It may actually just be confusing and cause additional qrm. Let's stick to the game plan. BTW I have tried 75; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00047.html (13,915 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <g3ldi@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:57:16 +0000; Hi Fabi. Well, it does work very well, but we must all be using the same speed. SO changing speeds within a normal contest is not going to get you extra points of Qs. John, GW4SKA should be home this; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00049.html (15,677 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: "Julio - VE3FH" <ve3fh@bell.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:51:17 -0500; So that's what it was around 14100, I tried reverse and I couldn't decode it so I moved on. I'm not changing my speed no matter how bad I need the multiplier. 73, Julio VE3FH Well I had 6 or 7 statio; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00054.html (8,576 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] XE contest @ 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:59:30 -0800; Yep, that is what many people did a few years ago when P5/4L4FN switched to 50 baud instead of using 45.45 baud :-) :-). It certainly thinned out the pile and made it easier for the rest of us to wor; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00055.html (8,566 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]