Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+YU6AO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+YU6AO\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] YU6AO (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 09:17:34 -0400; YU6AO must be using the same log, that they were using when I worked them on RTTY, July 27, as I got a "QSO B4", when I tried to work them today, in TARA? Good part....I must be in the log! :) C'Ya,; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-08/msg00015.html (6,228 bytes)
2. [RTTY] YU6AO (score: 1): Author: Graham <graham@m5aav.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:07:10 -0000; Has been CQing with few takers on 20 RTTY the last few days. Who needs a kW - 10watts and a dipole made the trip first time, also worked on SSB while out /P 5 watts to a /M whip second call 73 Graham; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-08/msg00040.html (6,610 bytes)
3. [RTTY] YU6AO (score: 1): Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:14:49 -0500; I worked YU6AO on RTTY, July 28th and sent my QSL I have not received their QSL. Anyone get a RTTY QSL from them, or am I not giving them enough time to reply ? I worked them 4 bands CW and 20 M RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00225.html (7,459 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] YU6AO (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:42:33 -0400; Sorry to hear that. RTTY is a really tough mode for busting pileups. The capture effect of the decoders, and the lengthy, continuous nature of the transmissions really makes it hard to bust through.; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00235.html (8,573 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]