Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Zone\s+4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Zone\s+4\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1): Author: "William D.Storer" <wstorer@cinci.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:55:30 -0400; Just a note about W4 RTTY contacts during the CQWW RTTY Contest. Noticed several of KY and TN callsigns sending zone 5 during the contest while others were sending the proper zone 4. Should be zone 4; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00212.html (7,166 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:13:54 -0400; At 08:55 AM 9/27/2004, William D.Storer wrote: Noticed several of KY and TN callsigns sending zone 5 during the contest while others were sending the proper zone 4. Should be zone 4 according to CQ's; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00214.html (7,948 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1): Author: W0YR@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:52:40 EDT; Yes, I noticed this. This is just ONE MORE REASON that in all contests where zone or call area matters, STATIONS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO SEND A CALLSIGN THAT REFLECTS THEIR ACTUAL LOCATION. But this is; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00221.html (6,584 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:57:46 -0500 (CDT); Not necessarily .... :-) -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #51466 (SSB) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00222.html (7,162 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:00:57 -0700; _________________________________________________________ I would take it a step further and require a separate statement of location, i.e. a callsign should never be used as an indicator of QTH or D; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00224.html (7,639 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1): Author: "Alan Curson" <alan@wd9gmk.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:47:06 -0500 (EST); I also noticed this after a review of my log. So I don't know if the wrong zone was sent or my software defaulted to what the call sign indicated and I didn't catch it. The other possibility is that; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00240.html (7,989 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Zone 4 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:59:44 -0500 (CDT); N1MM Logger seems to do this. Noticed it the first time this weekend. I assumed it was pulling the whole exchange out of the rx buffer, but evidently not. -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #5; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00246.html (7,558 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]