- 1. [RTTY] anybody want to try 160 rtty? (score: 1)
- Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:22:50 -0600
- I'm at 1808.000 calling cq Looking for rtty stations. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00059.html (6,385 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] anybody want to try 160 rtty? (score: 1)
- Author: Gedking@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 23:12:55 EST
- Yea but do it up on 1990 ED K8OT **Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) ________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00060.html (6,513 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] anybody want to try 160 rtty? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:06:57 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Why so high in the band? I suspect nearly all ops have their 160 antennas cut for low in the band so they can do CW DXing. The ARRL bandplan calls for digital mo
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00072.html (7,467 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] anybody want to try 160 rtty? (score: 1)
- Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anders@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:48:16 -0600
- Bill, Thanks. I will stay down around 1809. I can adjust the bw on the vertical (coil) however. 73 Charles/kk5oq --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00076.html (8,125 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu