Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+anybody\s+want\s+to\s+try\s+160\s+rtty\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] anybody want to try 160 rtty? (score: 1)
Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:22:50 -0600
I'm at 1808.000 calling cq Looking for rtty stations. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00059.html (6,385 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] anybody want to try 160 rtty? (score: 1)
Author: Gedking@aol.com
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 23:12:55 EST
Yea but do it up on 1990 ED K8OT **Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001) ________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00060.html (6,513 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] anybody want to try 160 rtty? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:06:57 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Why so high in the band? I suspect nearly all ops have their 160 antennas cut for low in the band so they can do CW DXing. The ARRL bandplan calls for digital mo
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00072.html (7,467 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] anybody want to try 160 rtty? (score: 1)
Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anders@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:48:16 -0600
Bill, Thanks. I will stay down around 1809. I can adjust the bw on the vertical (coil) however. 73 Charles/kk5oq --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00076.html (8,125 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu