- 21. Re: [RTTY] Greater than 600 watts for RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:56:49 -0400
- Propagation Place Power and Antenna Proficiency The sequence is debatable except for #1. Dave, K2YG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00113.html (8,398 bytes)
- 22. Re: [RTTY] Greater than 600 watts for RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:08:52 -0400
- Well stated! Neal Campbell Abroham Neal LLC _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00114.html (8,930 bytes)
- 23. Re: [RTTY] Greater than 600 watts for RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Ron WT7AA <fia@clouddancer.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 23:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
- Well, maybe not. I just finished a study on activating CQ Zone 2 for 160, using a reachable and populated site near the Arctic Circle. The propagation results on higher bands surprised me, as they w
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00118.html (9,466 bytes)
- 24. Re: [RTTY] Greater than 600 watts for RTTY (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:35:54 -0500
- I like it too. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Well stated! Neal Campbell Abroham Neal LLC Propagation Place Power and Antenna Proficiency The sequence is debatable except for #1
- /archives//html/RTTY/2017-03/msg00121.html (9,768 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu