Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+luggable\s+rtty\s+station\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+luggable\s+rtty\s+station\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:24:49 -0700; hi - I currently find myself often guest operating at local 'super' stations for RTTY contests. Since these stations typically do not have RTTY set up, I end up lugging computer, rigs, and even SO2R; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00121.html (7,651 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1): Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:28:52 -0700 (PDT); Hi Jeff and everyone: I travelled many times to V44, HC and else where using: a. TS-570DG with true FSK interface, b. Laptop with Writelog, c. small power supply Alinco 330, d. verticals. This setup; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00123.html (9,124 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1): Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT); Hi Jeff and everyone: I travelled many times to V44, HC and else where using: a. TS-570DG with true FSK interface, b. Laptop with Writelog, c. small power supply Alinco 330, d. verticals. This setup; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00124.html (8,914 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1): Author: "Neal Campbell" <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:52:45 -0400; I personally would go with IC-746pros. Full-output 100% duty cycle, the rx is quite gud, built-in rtty demod and not very heavy! hi - I currently find myself often guest operating at local 'super' st; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00126.html (9,038 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:03:58 -0400 (EDT); Err, the 756PROIII weighs just about the same as the 746PRO, (21+ vs 20-) and is a more capable radio. They're also just about the same volume, too. 73, doug I personally would go with IC-746pros. Fu; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00127.html (9,703 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:57:37 -0000; I recommend a pair of TS-850's, powered by a single Astron SS-30. Consider the following comparison of ARRL specs on the 1000D and TS-850: TX power output 1000D 195W 850 100W (I can vouch for this in; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00128.html (7,961 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1): Author: "Neal Campbell" <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:06:45 -0400; But you can buy 2 746pro's for the cost of one 756pro3! I owned a pro2 and it's a sweet rig so its not that I would refuse a double barrel pro3 setup but do you get double the performance for a lugga; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00133.html (10,459 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] luggable rtty station (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:27:23 -0400 (EDT); I was just addressing weight and volume issues. Yes, the 746PRO is a cheaper radio. And has 2M, also. But it's not significantly lighter or smaller than a 756PROIII, and isn't, in my opinion, as good; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00134.html (10,059 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]