Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+the\s+best\s+one\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+the\s+best\s+one\s+\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] the best one ? (score: 1): Author: vk4cej@hamsnet.net (John - vk4cej); Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 07:05:37 +1000; The more that I use it the more I become disenchanted with my PK-232 mbx.... I have searched the web and made every modification for improved rtty reception to it that I can find yet it still perform; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-01/msg00339.html (7,062 bytes)
2. [RTTY] the best one ? (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:28:40 -0600; I keep using my PK232. During this weekend's BARTG Sprint when the K index went to 3, I was amazed that the PK232 was outcopying MMTTY side-by-side on weak fluttered signals. If you want to replace t; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-01/msg00341.html (8,002 bytes)
3. [RTTY] the best one ? (score: 1): Author: vk4cej@hamsnet.net (John - vk4cej); Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:18:12 +1000; Hello Don.. thankyou for your reply... and OK to on your comments about the PK-232. Yes, I want to stay with an external device. Maybe this amazing performance that you are seeing with yours is relat; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-01/msg00345.html (8,533 bytes)
4. [RTTY] the best one ? (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:41:06 -0800; My personal recommendation is to keep your current modem, and front-end it with a Timewave DSP-599zx. You won't have to change any of your software configuration. You still transmit through the PK-23; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-01/msg00348.html (8,552 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]