Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+tracking\s+self\-spotters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+tracking\s+self\-spotters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] tracking self-spotters (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:12:35 -0000; Hi Tony (NN1D), You mention that there is tracking being done at some clusters to identify potential self-spotters. This is very good, and - I am sure - would be welcomed by many. However, the proof; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00004.html (6,784 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] tracking self-spotters (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:46:33 -0600; I guess I can't see the harm in self-spotting on the clusters, except for contest participants. I think it is a good thing on the low bands when rare DX stations (defined as any entity I haven't work; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00005.html (7,887 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] tracking self-spotters (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:34:51 +0000; Nelson Moyer wrote: I guess I can't see the harm in self spotting on the clusters, except for contest participants. I think it is a good thing on the low bands when rare DX stations (defined as any e; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00006.html (7,839 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]