Mail Archive Search: <+from:AA4LR at arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:AA4LR: 827 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ arrl.net: 1250 ]

Total 524 documents matching your query.

201. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:16:38 -0400; I didn't hear any RTTY stations above 7100. Nor SSB. Used to be tons of CW signals from 7100-7150 kHz 20 years ago. I hardly ever hear any signals there any more, other than SWBC carriers. Perhaps du; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00141.html (7,247 bytes)
202. [SECC] CQ WW RTTY AA4LR SOAB HP (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:43:02 -0400; CQ Worldwide DX Contest, RTTY Call: AA4LR Operator(s): AA4LR Station: AA4LR Class: SOAB HP QTH: GA Operating Time (hrs): 6.5 Summary: Band QSOs Pts State/Prov DX Zones -- 80: 29 34 18 0 2 40: 134 209; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00171.html (7,869 bytes)
203. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:22:42 -0400; Probably not, but it was a good suggestion. Because the frequency is busy. They are definitely NOT!!! "encroaching". In Region 1, RTTY is supposed to be in the area of 7025-7050; SSB is supposed to b; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00172.html (10,985 bytes)
204. [SECC] Frequency Allocation Discussion (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:10:53 -0400; Oh, man, I need to brush up on my snarky argument techniques.... Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00189.html (7,435 bytes)
205. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:33:51 -0400; Unlike CW, which includes the WHOLE of 40m. Bandplans are not absolute. The plans to not account for all the possible factors involved in the operation of amateur radio. If the bandplans were absolut; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00192.html (11,359 bytes)
206. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:37:03 -0400; Which raises an interesting question. There's a considerable number of active RTTY operators who are profoundly deaf. How are these operators expected to identify CW or other signals on or near their; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00193.html (8,808 bytes)
207. [SECC] Wind Load Ratings here in ATL (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:46:01 -0400; What county are you in? I know Gwinnett county is 75 mph. I suspect most of Atlanta is, too, since we are more than 115 miles away from hurricane-susceptible coastline. Sounds like the short one will; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00194.html (7,072 bytes)
208. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:28:34 -0400; Since you can only work stations ONCE, 160m is a waste of time. It's easier and faster to work folks on 80m or higher. 10m can often surprise. If it opens, there could be a lot of activity. An occasi; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00208.html (10,730 bytes)
209. [SECC] NAQP CW AA4LR Single Op LP (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 22:31:23 -0400; North American QSO Party, CW Call: AA4LR Operator(s): AA4LR Station: AA4LR Class: Single Op LP QTH: GA Operating Time (hrs): 6.6 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 160: 1 1 80: 46 21 40: 160 38 20: 72 25 15; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00036.html (7,886 bytes)
210. [SECC] NAQP RTTY AA4LR Single Op LP (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 22:32:15 -0400; North American QSO Party, RTTY Call: AA4LR Operator(s): AA4LR Station: AA4LR Class: Single Op LP QTH: GA Operating Time (hrs): 5.8 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 80: 10 9 40: 27 17 20: 58 28 15: 73 28 1; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00037.html (7,383 bytes)
211. [SECC] Passing on results to auditor (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:08:35 -0400; Jim, we're not quite that formal. The club bylaws do state that to be a member in good standing, you have to submit scores for the club in at least two contests. But, we don't "audit" this activity.; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00078.html (7,354 bytes)
212. [SECC] I need some advice (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:06:32 -0400; (Hey, Gary, good to hear from you!) I'm just wondering how you guys remember which keystrokes to use in the 37th hour of the contest. I'd be way too tired for that, but I won't forget how to use the; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00092.html (7,806 bytes)
213. [SECC] NAQP SSB AA4LR Single Op LP (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:30:31 -0400; North American QSO Party, SSB Call: AA4LR Operator(s): AA4LR Station: AA4LR Class: Single Op LP QTH: GA Operating Time (hrs): 10 Radios: SO2R Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 160: 16 10 80: 63 24 40: 277; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00131.html (10,165 bytes)
214. [SECC] Team entry in log? (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:28:29 -0400; You don't need to put the Team name in. THe contest sponsors require that we pre-register all teams, so they already know which team you are on. For the club name, always put "South East Contest Club; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00139.html (7,065 bytes)
215. [SECC] [SEDXC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:04:47 -0400; Good choice. The best reason for going through all the hassle is that you will have less liability to worry about as your homeowner's insurance will likely cover it. If you just put it up without the; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00157.html (8,058 bytes)
216. [SECC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:11:12 -0400; A typical small tribander will have a turning radius of 15-20 feet. If you could move it just four more feet away from the property line, you'd be able to accommodate that. I would suggest you look u; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00158.html (8,265 bytes)
217. [SECC] N1MM Newbie for WAE DX SSB (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:16:08 -0400; N1MM is really designed around rig-control. Although it is possible to use N1MM with a manually-controlled rig, it is not very easy. In contrast, using it with a computer-cotnrolled rig is much easie; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00187.html (7,763 bytes)
218. [SECC] Welcome New Members - SECC (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:12:02 -0400; Please join me in welcoming the following new members to the South East Contest Club: * Wayne KB4AAC - Wayne joined in June. From his e-mail address, I would guess he operates CW, or it could be his; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00201.html (7,362 bytes)
219. [SECC] [SEDXC] Rig Recommendations for ~$500.00 (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:19:32 -0400; A lot of the early DSP IF rigs like the TS-870/570 and the IC-775 have less than stellar performance with large adjacent signals. You don't want an old TS-820/520 rig. As nostalgic as they are, the 8; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00206.html (10,026 bytes)
220. [SECC] wrtc finish (score: 75): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:56:54 -0400; Alright, Jim! And John and Jeff put in a decent showing as well. Excellent! Sorry I didn't get to play in this one - I was vacationing on the SC coast and had no time for radio. Bill Coleman, AA4LR,; /archives//html/SECC/2006-07/msg00037.html (6,683 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]