Mail Archive Search: <+from:MossDJ at INPO.org>

Results:

References: [ +from:MossDJ: 8 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ INPO.org: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] FW: ke4uw - Uploaded log file (score: 187): Author: MossDJ at INPO.org (Moss, Dave J (WANO)); Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:20:45 +0000; I sent a note to ARRL asking for a bit of help figuring out why my LOTW totals didn't change after uploading my logs for CQWW DX. Katherine sent me the note/link below. I guess a lot of us were wanti; /archives//html/SECC/2011-11/msg00006.html (8,952 bytes)
2. [SECC] Field Day and W4AN (score: 187): Author: MossDJ at INPO.org (Moss, Dave J (INPO)); Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:31:59 -0400; Several of us (KE4UW, WA2MBP, KN6RO, WB4SQ, and others) will be setting up a field day operation in Paulding County. We will use N4N for the primary station call, and would be glad to have Chris and; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00232.html (9,803 bytes)
3. [SECC] Field Day and W4AN (score: 187): Author: MossDJ at INPO.org (Moss, Dave J (INPO)); Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:58:12 -0400; This is from the 2005 rules on ARRL's web site: "4.1.1. Get-On-The-Air (GOTA) Station. Any Class A (or F) entry whose transmitter classification is two or more transmitters may also operate one addit; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00235.html (9,866 bytes)
4. [SECC] Club call (score: 187): Author: MossDJ at INPO.org (Moss, Dave J (INPO)); Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:17:59 -0400; Sorry about the confusion. I was just extending an invitation to Chris to join us for field day, as I (maybe erroneously) understood from ther first series of notes that he was looking for a field da; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00253.html (8,042 bytes)
5. [SECC] Field Day and W4AN (score: 187): Author: MossDJ at INPO.org (Moss, Dave J (INPO)); Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:23:44 -0400; Jeff, et al I'm not sure how to say it any more clearly, but N4N isn't interested in competing with folks for the club call. Never were, never will be. The suggestion was made in response to an email; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00265.html (13,666 bytes)
6. [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM (score: 187): Author: MossDJ at INPO.org (Moss, Dave J (INPO)); Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:31:36 -0500; Jeff brings up a good point--better scheduling to avoid these conflicts is the best bet. But realistically, the CQWW WPX has also been around a while, and is probably about as big a RTTY contest as t; /archives//html/SECC/2005-02/msg00026.html (8,938 bytes)
7. [SECC] RTTY fastest growing (score: 187): Author: MossDJ at INPO.org (Moss, Dave J (INPO)); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:55:10 -0500; Well, I'm one of "those dang RTTY guys", and I didn't QRM anybody. What I saw last weekend was a lot of very good RTTY operators. May have been a few less than perfect, but I'd venture that there wer; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00113.html (10,391 bytes)
8. [SECC] Field Day Results (score: 187): Author: MossDJ at INPO.org (Moss, Dave J (INPO)); Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:01:18 -0500; The N4N field day group (with several SECC members, including WB4SQ, KN6RO, WA2MBP, and KE4UW) was number 21 overall, number one in GA. We have accumulated more equipment and antennas than we have ha; /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00199.html (8,251 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]