Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ae4y: 243 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ mindspring.com: 1467 ]

Total 223 documents matching your query.

181. [SECC] Re: NAQP team (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:22:26 -0500
Tom, I'm sorry that you're frustrated with the NAQP team effort. I appreciate your attempt to set up a team and am disappointed that it didn't turn out to your satisfaction. That said, it appears to
/archives//html/SECC/2004-07/msg00053.html (10,222 bytes)

182. [SECC] NAQP RTTY Results (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 07:33:34 -0500
Here's my results from this weekend's NAQP RTTY contest. The SFI popped back up nicely yesterday and it was good to see 10 and 15 open. I knew I wasn't going to be able to go full time, but I had to
/archives//html/SECC/2004-07/msg00064.html (6,424 bytes)

183. [SECC] ARRL DX CW Results available to Members on ARRL webpage (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:52:16 -0500
Apparently, I must have forgotten to send in my log. I'm not listed in the results. Kent, AE4Y
/archives//html/SECC/2004-07/msg00090.html (6,945 bytes)

184. [SECC] ANARTS RTTY (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:00:46 -0500
Conditions were (are) just awful. I'll report this just to reflect contest activity, but I didn't even score it properly. The ANARTS RTTY contest has a very unusual scoring formula and I just didn't
/archives//html/SECC/2004-06/msg00058.html (6,466 bytes)

185. [SECC] ARRL Field Day (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:00:11 -0500
I know it's not the same thing, but I did Field Day from home. As always there was lots of activity and I enjoyed giving out 2 point QSOs to the guys out there suffering through bad food, mosquitoes,
/archives//html/SECC/2004-06/msg00108.html (6,212 bytes)

186. [SECC] Tips on getting used to iambic paddle? (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:14:31 -0500
I've been using an iambic paddle for about 25 years. For a couple of years prior to the iambic, I used a regular paddle keyer. It seems to me that the transition was relatively easy. As I recall the
/archives//html/SECC/2004-06/msg00118.html (7,995 bytes)

187. [SECC] CQ WPX Results (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 18:56:24 -0500
In between birthday parties, anniversaries, and movies; I enjoyed operating in the WPX this weekend. It was good to get back on and generate a little barefoot RF from the stealth antenna and TS570D.
/archives//html/SECC/2004-05/msg00078.html (6,399 bytes)

188. [SECC] GA QSO Party (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:12:59 -0500
I managed to make a few QSOs in the QP this weekend. Here's my summary stats: Band Contacts Mult Score -- -- -- -- 3.5 13 0 0 7 85 16 2720 14 29 16 928 Total 127 32 8128 I hope everyone had a nice Ea
/archives//html/SECC/2004-04/msg00061.html (6,373 bytes)

189. [SECC] Fwd: Russian DX Contest - 2004 (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:31:56 -0500
I got one, but I'm not sure how they got my information either. I would assume that this will stimulate some activity for them. Kent, AE4Y This is one way to stir up interest in a contest. I wonder w
/archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00147.html (7,375 bytes)

190. [SECC] CQ WPX RTTY (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:20:54 -0500
Here's the results of my effort in this weekend's CQ WPX RTTY contest: Single Operator, Low Power Band Contacts Mult Score -- -- -- -- 3.5 26 15 900 7 74 44 7656 14 105 45 6075 21 104 51 9435 28 38 2
/archives//html/SECC/2004-02/msg00052.html (6,411 bytes)

191. [SECC] ARRL CW DX Contest (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:00:10 -0500
I was only able to operate on Saturday, and then only intermittently throughout the day. That said, conditions seemed to be pretty good with lots of activity; just wish I could have spared more time
/archives//html/SECC/2004-02/msg00083.html (6,418 bytes)

192. [SECC] ARRL RTTY Round Up (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 21:29:22 -0500
I think that I put in about 5 hours all told. Too many "end of the holiday season" distractions to do much more. There was quite a bit of activity on all bands; and conditions, while not great by any
/archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00031.html (6,472 bytes)

193. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:11:25 -0500
That was just about the most fun I've had contesting in quite a while. Right now I'm too tired to try to figure out which SECCers I worked, but I know it was a fairly good list. I was having more suc
/archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00066.html (7,754 bytes)

194. [SECC] NA CW Sprint Results (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 23:03:16 -0500
Here's my contribution to Southern Sprint Coalition #5: Band Contacts Mult Score -- -- -- -- 3.5 78 9 702 7 53 25 1325 14 20 6 120 Total 151 40 6040 Log will be submitted tomorrow. Kent, AE4Y
/archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00322.html (6,132 bytes)

195. [SECC] cqww contest (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 07:51:03 -0500
You missed mine: (SOLP) Band Contacts Zone DXCC Score -- -- -- -- -- 3.5 11 6 11 425 7 38 11 31 4620 14 32 11 26 3367 21 97 18 58 20976 28 122 17 60 27566 Total 300 63 186 214140 Kent, AE4Y Here is w
/archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00009.html (9,381 bytes)

196. [SECC] Club participation levels (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:55:49 -0500
I don't typically post my results on 3830. I agree that relying on information from that site for compiling club totals may not truly reflect the SECC's true level of participation. Similarly, I susp
/archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00012.html (6,651 bytes)

197. [SECC] SECC: Changes? (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (Kent McCorkle)
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 07:59:14 -0500
Just a few words regarding the current controversy over what the SECC should or should not be. What is the real problem that the SECC is facing? The only one that I've seen mentioned is lack of parti
/archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00074.html (8,504 bytes)

198. [SECC] Re:C&bls (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:03:31 -0500
AE4Y votes yes The following text is an exact copy of the Constitution and By Laws from the SECC web page. MEETINGS: Article IV The By-Laws shall provide for regular and special meetings, a minimum o
/archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00130.html (9,855 bytes)

199. [SECC] 10M (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:53:24 -0500
I'm having some trouble with my logging program, but one way or another, I'll be in there too. Kent, AE4Y _______________________________________________ SECC mailing list SECC@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00146.html (6,268 bytes)

200. [SECC] vote (score: 67)
Author: ae4y at mindspring.com (AE4Y)
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:54:33 -0500
A motion to make changes to the constitution and by-laws sumitted by K4SB as I recall. Just what are we voting on? Dan/W4NTI _______________________________________________ SECC mailing list SECC@con
/archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00147.html (6,952 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu