- 1. Fw: [SECC] Comments requested. (score: 1)
- Author: chapoton@mindspring.com (Henry Chapoton)
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:01:29 -0400
- Bill wrote: I think disqualification should not be done by a computer. It should only come by careful consideration by a human judge. Computers don't disqualify logs. The log checkers do. Those guys
- /archives//html/SECC/2000-06/msg00036.html (10,322 bytes)
- 2. [SECC] Hullo? (score: 1)
- Author: chapoton@mindspring.com (Henry Chapoton)
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:22:51 -0400
- it works greg na8v/4 -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com Se
- /archives//html/SECC/2000-04/msg00004.html (6,701 bytes)
- 3. [SECC] true north (score: 1)
- Author: chapoton@mindspring.com (Henry Chapoton)
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:58:58 -0400
- I've been lost for years......does anybody really know what time it is? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@c
- /archives//html/SECC/2000-04/msg00006.html (6,704 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu