Mail Archive Search: <+from:jt.w6fo at gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jt.w6fo: 55 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ gmail.com: 1203 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

21. [SECC] TxQP W6FO Single Op LP (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:56:41 -0400; Texas QSO Party Call: W6FO Operator(s): W6FO Station: W6FO Class: Single Op LP QTH: Canton, GA Operating Time (hrs): 0.5 Summary: Band CW Qs Ph Qs Dig Qs -- 160: 80: 40: 20: 7 15: 10: 6: 2: UHF: -- T; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00122.html (6,822 bytes)
22. [SECC] , CQ WW RTTY W6FO/4 SOSB/20 LPClaimed Score (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:13:28 -0400; CQ Worldwide DX Contest, RTTY Call: W6FO/4 Operator(s): W6FO Station: W6FO/4 Class: SOSB/20 LP QTH: Canton, GA Operating Time (hrs): 1 Summary: Band QSOs Pts State/Prov DX Zones -- 80: 40: 20: 30 68; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00123.html (6,930 bytes)
23. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:02:43 -0400; I think Fred says it well. I'm also an active QRP'er and fan of CW but very active now with RTTY. The die hard CW fanatics on QRP-L the past few days have been painfully whining about "loosing THEIR; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00131.html (8,262 bytes)
24. [SECC] Quick, Easy, and Cheap LOCAL antenna for 20M (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:42:12 -0400; Anyone have any suggestions for a quick and cheap to construct antenna for 20M that will work well for regional work? With the upcoming AR QSO Party, my dipole will most likely not work as signals se; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00133.html (6,784 bytes)
25. [SECC] Frequency Allocation Discussion (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:03:10 -0400; There is a movement in the QRP community to relocate to 7030, one org, QRP ARCI, has already voted to make it their official calling freq., but it too is receiving opposition from stubborn hams who s; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00148.html (7,626 bytes)
26. [SECC] CQWW RTTY Reflections (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:46:31 -0400; Looking at the initial 3830 results, I am pleased by the score for K4EA. However, at the same time, I feel distressed as he did most of the contest as M/M by himself. Early into the contest with only; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00149.html (6,993 bytes)
27. [SECC] Trade: Tower for Mini-Beam/Rotator (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:59:51 -0400; This tower project I have been thinking about is probably more of a project, logisitcally and financially, than I should have taken on. Dipoles are working better than I thought at my hilltop QTH, I; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00161.html (7,015 bytes)
28. [SECC] Next RTTY Contest is only 16d away! (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:39:50 -0400; Ok RTTY freaks, the next RTTY contest is coming up... get ready for the Makrothen Contest! The contest takes place on the second full weekend of October each year. The next contest dates are Saturday; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00162.html (7,517 bytes)
29. [SECC] Next RTTY Contest is only 16d away! (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:25:45 -0400; True, but dedicated single mode contests seem to bring out the most diddlers. Oops, is this a family reflector.. can we talk about diddling here? -- JT Croteau - W6FO - Canton, GA ARS #2,147 | NoGA-Q; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00169.html (7,059 bytes)
30. [SECC] Penninger Tipping Bases (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:29:35 -0400; Is anyone using any of the Penninger Tipping Bases yet? I know Tad was pretty psyched about them at Stone Mtn. last year. I wonder how they'd do in a semi-perm installation with a small tri-bander, p; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00180.html (6,512 bytes)
31. [SECC] Wind Load Ratings here in ATL (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:10:53 -0400; When planning an antenna installation here in the Atlanta area, can I plan on a max. wind rating of 80/90 MPH? I know that all bets are probably off if a direct tornado or hurricane come through, eve; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00182.html (6,750 bytes)
32. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:55:42 -0400; Ahem. There ya go painting everyone with the same brush again. *smirk* I just started using RTTY three weeks ago but I still love CW and respect the CW ops. Hell, I'm one of the few people who respec; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00185.html (8,760 bytes)
33. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:48:11 -0400; Ahem. Painting with a very broad brush again Dan, but I still love ya and only busting your chops. I don't operate CW mainly cause I am too lazy to learn beyond the mental block I set in my mind when; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00188.html (9,381 bytes)
34. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:32:48 -0400; Seeing how I only paid money for the right to use HF, I guess I'll make Dan happy and go find a new hobby and will give the HF airwaves back over to Dan for CW only usage. I'm done on this subject. -; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00191.html (8,227 bytes)
35. [SECC] Decisions.. Decisions (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:05:26 -0400; The SECC Picnic is the same weekend as the Makrothen RTTY Contest. HMM, this is no bueno. heh. At least it isn't the same day as the NA RTTY Sprint which is the 15th. Let's see, hanging outside with; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00198.html (6,345 bytes)
36. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:49:46 -0400; I don't think I owe anyone an apology. What have I done wrong? You are the one calling yourself the better man than I because you passed all the exams "in front of the FCC". Big deal, times have chan; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00201.html (9,586 bytes)
37. [SECC] OP Available (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:15:14 -0400; I'd really like to improve my HF contesting skills and this only comes from experience. If anyone who is setup for multi-op is ever in need of an op for a contest, I'd appreciate the opportunity to p; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00138.html (6,552 bytes)
38. [SECC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:44:40 -0400; For those who don't know, I am in the process of restoring the 55' Height's crankup that was once on Jack Hague's, K4DN, property. I hope to get it back in the air before the end of the year. I'm wai; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00147.html (8,834 bytes)
39. [SECC] [SEDXC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:29:48 -0400; Dave, yeah. I was taking this into consideration. Unless I win the lottery, my biggest rotatable antenna on the tower will be a 2-ele Quad on a 12' boom. If I do win the lottery, I'll just move to so; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00151.html (7,899 bytes)
40. [SECC] [SEDXC] Building Permits for Tower Bases (score: 71): Author: jt.w6fo at gmail.com (JT Croteau); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:29:35 -0400; True. I could put the center of the tower smack dab in the center of the back yard where my HF2V is currently. The YL will not like it there but I probably would not have any set-back issues nor boom; /archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00154.html (8,543 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]