Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb@mindspring.com: 151 ]

Total 151 documents matching your query.

21. [SECC] Re: Topband: Dedicated topband transceiver (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:16:26 +0000
Well, if N4PN still has that old Drake R4A, that might be something to look into. I swear, that thing could hear signals which weren't there. The other thing to consider would be Tom Crosby's HBR. I
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00091.html (7,089 bytes)

22. [SECC] Club names (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:20:16 +0000
The ARRL has already posted messages that initials for a club name are not acceptable. Reason is (example) the Greenville ARC in SC could have the same initials as the Gainsville ARC in GA. They spec
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00092.html (6,794 bytes)

23. [SECC] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:05:54 +0000
Quite a thrill to discover CT does not cover the NAQP 10 mins before it started. Quick learning curve on NA. NA kept freezing up on me requiring a reboot. Think I may have a severe RF problem, althou
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00096.html (6,841 bytes)

24. Fwd: [SECC] SECC NAQP CW Teams (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:06:26 +0000
SECC #1 AA4LR Bill GA 63357 K4NO Greg AL 204624 K9AY Gary GA 143284 KA9EKJ Rod AL ? K4WI Cort AL 84600 SECC #2 W4ATL Roger GA ? K4SB Ed GA 33768 K2UFT Dick GA 78120 NE4S Mike GA ? W4NTI Dan AL 52152
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00097.html (7,391 bytes)

25. Fwd: [SECC] SECC NAQP CW Teams (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:25:18 +0000
Still need scores from NE4S and KA9EKJ SECC #1 AA4LR Bill GA 96000 ( corrected) K4NO Greg AL 204624 K9AY Gary GA 143284 KA9EKJ Rod AL ? K4WI Cort AL 84600 SECC #2 W4ATL Roger GA 101568 K4SB Ed GA 337
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00120.html (7,503 bytes)

26. Fwd: [SECC] SECC NAQP CW Teams (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:48:13 +0000
Need score from NE4S SECC #1 AA4LR Bill GA 96000 K4NO Greg AL 204624 K9AY Gary GA 143284 KA9EKJ Rod AL 62062 K4WI Cort AL 84600 Total 589570 SECC #2 W4ATL Roger GA 101568 K4SB Ed GA 33768 K2UFT Dick
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00121.html (7,706 bytes)

27. Fwd: [SECC] SECC NAQP CW Teams (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:08:11 +0000
SECC #1 AA4LR Bill GA 96000 K4NO Greg AL 204624 K9AY Gary GA 143284 KA9EKJ Rod AL 62062 K4WI Cort AL 84600 Total 589570 SECC #2 W4ATL Roger GA 101568 K4SB Ed GA 33768 K2UFT Dick GA 78120 NE4S Mike GA
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00124.html (7,520 bytes)

28. [SECC] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] ARLB007 ARRL Board Adopts Modified NoviceBand Refarming Plan (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (k4sb)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:46:44 -0500
So, they are at it again. The ONLY way we are going to stop this is to vote in new directors. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative req
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00188.html (7,228 bytes)

29. [SECC] CQ 160 Activity (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (k4sb)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:08:48 -0500
Well, I've asked twice to be put on this list. Will be part time ( about 12-14 hours. SOHP As as suggestion, since we have a pretty good number, it might not be a bad idea to have everyone meet, say
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00201.html (7,780 bytes)

30. [SECC] CQ 160 Activity (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (k4sb)
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:18:25 -0500
One of the guys commented that 1850 is technically in the phone band. How about we move our meeting to 1830? 1200 and 1300, or for that matter, on the top of every hour afterward until the band opens
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00210.html (7,473 bytes)

31. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:19:18 +0000
This is great news! Not only will we finally! be able to pick up K4WI, but N4PN and I'm sure a host of others. Since we seem to be able to do business via the internet, I move that we immediately def
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00247.html (8,294 bytes)

32. [SECC] SEDXC name ? (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:03:43 +0000
I thought Bill put out a message that there was so little planned activity from the SEDXC that our scores would go to SECC. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@con
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00273.html (7,083 bytes)

33. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:23:51 +0000
In the first place, I realize the value of all our members, and would hate to see some excluded. In the second place, I am distinctly under the impression that the rule change did NOT mention section
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00276.html (9,620 bytes)

34. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:45:15 +0000
It is sections, not divisions. Keep what we have, but realign the circle. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00278.html (8,027 bytes)

35. [SECC] 160M Op List (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 03:18:33 +0000
Well, spent a good part of the day getting a line over a pretty tall tree, and the other end to my 90' crankup, which has a 24' moly mast with a thrust bearing on the top. So, one end is about 105' a
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00003.html (7,308 bytes)

36. [SECC] 46 radials now on vertical/FT1000MP S/N observation (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 18:02:47 +0000
Hi Ken..mayby a little info to help you. The pure impedence on a 1/4 vertical is about 37.2 ohms. Thus, if no radials are used, you should get almost a 1:1 SWR. But guess where that extra 13 ohms is
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00017.html (8,441 bytes)

37. [SECC] ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 15:17:08 +0000
Think it would be a good idea for all the SECCers to plan on a common frequency, say 1850, about 4pm our time on Sat. This should max out our effort to work each other. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00040.html (7,874 bytes)

38. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 15:20:52 +0000
In this case no, the rules only state that the 1830-1835 section be left alone for DX. To try to cram everyone into 40 kHz would be bedlam. Don't forget to tune up to 1900 or so, it'll be packed. 73
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00041.html (8,386 bytes)

39. [SECC] 160 test/secc (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 14:44:48 +0000
Good idea...it's starting to get dark about 5 here so how about 4 and 5 pm. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUES
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00045.html (6,434 bytes)

40. [SECC] 160 (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 17:35:22 +0000
Have a few minor typing errors to fix, which thankfully I made note of, but as of now, score is around the 59,000 mark with over 400 Qs. Spent all week from Mon-Thurs putting out radials...Finally wo
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00054.html (7,955 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu