Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4sb at bellsouth.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb: 721 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ bellsouth.net: 2594 ]

Total 291 documents matching your query.

101. [SECC] W4AN (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:46:14 +0000; It also has not changed since July 10 1955. As well as being my childhood sweetheart's birthday, it is also my brother's anniversary, the birthday of one of my buddies who got me interested in ham ra; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00036.html (7,979 bytes)
102. [SECC] UNC vs IL (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:16:38 +0000; Play with the best, die like the rest. Yes!! 73 Ed, Class of 60; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00038.html (5,796 bytes)
103. [SECC] [SEDXC] Memorial Service for K4GA (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:42:56 +0000; -- Well, I need to check it out, but I'm afraid that I have egg on my face. I just received an email from a buddy who pointed out that a single club may have more than one vanity call, with the singu; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00041.html (8,444 bytes)
104. [SECC] [SEDXC] K4GA (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:56:33 +0000; -- I would say the probability of that is well above 99%. BUT, it would be a very long shot with the FCC vanity process as they now apply it. The only way for the call to be reissued within the 2 ye; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00044.html (8,630 bytes)
105. [SECC] 2005 Georgia QSO Party (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:54:01 +0000; One point also in regard to the GQP. For us who will be operating from our home stations, please leave the primary frequiences to the rovers. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00068.html (6,260 bytes)
106. [SECC] First GQP Log from K0RI (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 14:43:41 +0000; Michael Condon wrote: Rex, K7QQ admonishes John, K4BAI go get to work and be active. (20M SBB Chat)> He also gave me "what for" for not having CW capability... Guilty, but I will get that part done n; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00094.html (6,454 bytes)
107. [SECC] GQP K4EA SOHP (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:41:14 +0000; I think I worked ME about 5 times. Can't remember LA but seems I may have. Results tomorrow. WL has screwed up score. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00101.html (6,146 bytes)
108. [SECC] GQP Claimed Score, K4BAI (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (k4sb); Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:32:52 +0000; Just a reminder. The W4AN log must also be submitteed to John. Haven't had that much fun since the pigs ate my older brother!! 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00112.html (6,371 bytes)
109. [SECC] Dinner tomorrow night anyone? (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:00:56 +0000; First of all, Acworth is about 18 miles NW of I-285 on I-75N. About 6 exits N of Town Center Mall. Maybe 10-12 mins from the mall to Acworth. 2 exits..Actually, if your destination is in the City, ta; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00151.html (7,046 bytes)
110. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:14:32 +0000; -- Heartily agree with those who say this is the year we take #1. A lousy 400,000 points would do it. We need to start planning, and get committments from all those who will operate, on SSB, CW or b; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00164.html (8,139 bytes)
111. [SECC] [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:04:06 +0000; FYI The ARRL Executive Committee has just published the proposed ARRL petition to segment the bands by bandwidth instead of by mode. http://www.remote.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/04/13/1/?nc=1 Just a; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00171.html (6,634 bytes)
112. [SECC] [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:16:02 +0000; This is a post I received from the RTTY Reflector. I must admit I don't understand all the ramifications, but many other posts on different reflectors have stated that WinLink would create havoc on a; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00172.html (7,643 bytes)
113. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:24:33 +0000; Yes, that is what I meant. Appreciate Jon's comments, but fail to understand how this would be an "ethics" problem. Perhaps someone can explain it. It's not covered in my "Sweepstakes for Absolute Du; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00173.html (8,621 bytes)
114. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:50:05 +0000; In the first place, I did not mean to imply sarcasm. It was simply a honest question. In the second place, it is sometimes called "good ethics" if you request permission before you pass an email to; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00181.html (8,942 bytes)
115. [SECC] Circle (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:14:54 +0000; Just for information, only 3 full members are affected by this, and the distance between 2 is less than 6 miles. And quite clearly, in past operations, the member who was in the original circle is al; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00191.html (6,473 bytes)
116. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 04:26:39 +0000; Regardless of which side members take on this issue, I feel it has caused great damage. Excercising my member rights to request a modification of the By Laws, I propose that the entire section be del; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00201.html (8,085 bytes)
117. [SECC] Sweepstakes Club Competition (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 04:37:32 +0000; Oops, less than clear. I am speaking of aRTICLE VII of the By Laws, which allows for the changes to the circle. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00202.html (7,895 bytes)
118. [SECC] Article VII (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:24:17 +0000; I have received a few private emails suggesting that Article VII should not be deleted. While everyone is of course, free to express their own opinions, I am going to take the following step suggeste; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00215.html (6,914 bytes)
119. [SECC] Article VII (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 02:48:22 +0000; There is nothing in our BLs which requires a second. And although balloting may be open or sent privatly to John, the posted results are secret. -- Well, to my knowledge, there has not been a second.; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00219.html (7,270 bytes)
120. [SECC] Fieldday (score: 54): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:30:48 +0000; FYI Chris Sells ( AC4CS ) has requested and been granted permission to use the club call W4AN during Field Day. I'm sure he would appreciate working members of the SECC. 73 Ed, Trustee; /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00231.html (6,107 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]