Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4sb at comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb: 721 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ comcast.net: 2044 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] [SEDXC] ARRL Election (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 03:35:12 +0000; -- I'll try to make this as gentle as possible. If candidates are offended by remarks, they have two choice: Unsubscribe, or withdraw from consideration. And NOBODY dictates to me what message I may; /archives//html/SECC/2007-10/msg00050.html (7,225 bytes)
2. [SECC] SECC Circle Proposal (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 03:35:58 +0000; ku8e wrote: I don't have a mapping program but I do have Google Earth. I played around with the measuring tool and found a good location that might work for us. The center would be near the county li; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00012.html (6,414 bytes)
3. [SECC] Proposed New Center for Circle (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:12:56 +0000; For the record, my exact GPS coordinates are 34.03'N and 84.74' W. Looking at one of the circles with Map Point, it bothers me that Bartow County, which is about 4 miles NE of me is out of the circle; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00036.html (9,452 bytes)
4. [SECC] SECC_2007_175-mi_circle SECC Circle Proposal (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:25:14 +0000; Interesting figures from Jeff's last post. Again, I have to software to determine exact locations rather than any zip codes in use. I can also decode the Buckmaster database using a program I wrote i; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00037.html (7,321 bytes)
5. [SECC] [SECC/2007circle] SECC_2007_175-mi_circle_Nr02 proposal (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:13:11 +0000; Looking at the latest circles given by Matt, K4BAI seems right on the limits. I would think the Magenta line would offer a little more safety. BTW, has anyone ever asked the ARRL contest director abo; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00043.html (6,448 bytes)
6. [SECC] W4NTI (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:47:09 +0000; Although Dan did submit a resignation, and Hal accepted it, I think we're all in a much better frame of mind now. Such resignations should be sent to the Secretary of the Club. I therefore formally m; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00075.html (5,999 bytes)
7. [SECC] Anarts Contest (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:36:32 +0000; Well, I think Writelog was not playing with a full bit bucket, but this is what shows. Score submitted for SECC. Band Qs Pts DX Call Areas 40 23 190 5 10 20 124 1756 35 13 15 10 99 3 4 Totals 157 204; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00096.html (6,364 bytes)
8. [SECC] ANARTS (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:02:53 +0000; Finally did the scorings manually for Anarts. New final score 69,940. Will resubmit. Still haven't found why WriteLog won't score it correctly. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00101.html (5,944 bytes)
9. [SECC] contestRe: circle (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:17:17 +0000; Rick Dougherty NQ4I wrote: Hello all...its time to step up to the plate here..as the new president of the SECC, I want to weigh in on the issue..the circle and its location will be decided sometime i; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00139.html (8,081 bytes)
10. [SECC] New Circle (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 03:47:00 +0000; According to Article VII of our By-Laws, a full member may request a "special" meeting be called by the president to consider any motion. Article VII requires the support of 3 additional full members; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00150.html (6,773 bytes)
11. [SECC] Circle (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:13:48 +0000; At the time I posted my motion to redefine the boundaries of the SECC circle, it did not occur to me that all information Matt, K4AQ and I were using did not contain an up to date roster. Frankly, ou; /archives//html/SECC/2007-06/msg00163.html (6,482 bytes)
12. [SECC] BS7H (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:14:59 +0000; Here are the stats for the BS7H op. Total of 45,820 Qs with 39% UNIQUE!! ( 17,884 ) Complete stats at http://www.scarboroughreef.com/srstats.html . Absolutely pitiful!! ( and yes, I already had them; /archives//html/SECC/2007-05/msg00060.html (6,065 bytes)
13. [SECC] GQP Changes (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:51:49 +0000; 1. For Ga stations, the number of multipliers would be per band i.e. cw and and ssb would all be available to work...this would greatly increase activity...our current limit of 63 mults would be repl; /archives//html/SECC/2007-04/msg00149.html (7,333 bytes)
14. [SECC] GQP Changes (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:17:53 +0000; -- Well, according to many surveys, people either use Writelog or N1MM. We might have a chance of MM rewriting the software, but as John pointed out, Writelog would require a major modification, and; /archives//html/SECC/2007-04/msg00155.html (7,819 bytes)
15. [SECC] 2007 GQP -- How about county line ops to stimulateactivity? (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:37:38 +0000; Just how do you simulate a CL if there is no road? Many MARAC members have software which can determine where you are on county lines. Plus, many rivers and streams serve as county line borders here; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00041.html (7,668 bytes)
16. [SECC] 2007 BARTG (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 04:32:41 +0000; 2007 BARTG SPRING RTTY CONTEST CALL: K4SB Country USA _X__ Single OP., All Band QSOs DX: Call Areas 80m: 48 7 13 40m: 106 21 13 20m: 151 37 17 15m: 15 12 0 10m: 0 0 0 Total: 320 Continents: 6 Total m; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00075.html (6,137 bytes)
17. [SECC] Claimed Scores, Last Weekend's Contests; This Week's Contests (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:58:37 +0000; -- 1 RTTY entry from all of Georgia!! That is rediculous! 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00087.html (7,033 bytes)
18. [SECC] What is the ARRL doing? (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:15:57 +0000; Daniel Jeswald wrote: The word I hear on this subject is they are basically trying to save their proposal of the Amateur WINLINK EMAIL SYSTEM. They have obviously gone the way of Washington DC and OW; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00124.html (6,861 bytes)
19. [SECC] WPX (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:17:46 +0000; 2007 World-Wide RTTY WPX Contest CALL: NR4X CLASS:SOALL Operator K4SB All bands Band QSOs QSO points Prefixes Score: Rest periods (Single Operator 160m: 80m: 82 224 38 40m: 126 496 95 20m: 220 488 10; /archives//html/SECC/2007-02/msg00044.html (6,226 bytes)
20. [SECC] NAQP RTTY (score: 59): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:23:59 +0000; Conditions were pretty bad. Got KH6 on 20 and 40 + 1 JA on 20, KL8 on 20. Now, someone explain to me how NJ was not worked. 80 71 30 40 101 37 20 121 38 15 14 8 10 TOTAL 307 113 SOLP 307 QSOs * 113 M; /archives//html/SECC/2007-02/msg00087.html (6,224 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]