Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb: 721 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ comcast.net: 2044 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

21. [SECC] RTTY RU (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:11:01 +0000
262 Qsos Total Score 20174 73 Ed
/archives//html/SECC/2007-01/msg00025.html (5,760 bytes)

22. [SECC] K4GA (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:31:58 +0000
Would like to advise everyone that the Trusteeship of K4GA has been transferred to Matt, K4AQ. All requests for use of the call should be directed to him. He has generally indicated to me that first
/archives//html/SECC/2007-01/msg00093.html (6,015 bytes)

23. [SECC] Wire Beam Ideas (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 03:30:10 +0000
-- Guys, be very careful wiith Delta loops, either singly or with a DE or Ref. Their angle of radiation is extremely low, with result that your signal will fly right over EU. Great for the near East
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00011.html (6,811 bytes)

24. [SECC] Alabama Contest Group and SECC Club Circle (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:38:55 +0000
I assume that they will not be submitting scores for the SECC anymore. I was wondering if there has been any thought about moving the SECC club circle ? We obviously don't need the circle to be as fa
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00058.html (10,172 bytes)

25. [SECC] Alabama Contest Group and SECC Club Circle (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:37:59 +0000
Quote from the QRP reflector. I have another silly question. What diameter hole is usually required for a BNC panel jack? I don't have one at the moment in the junk box but trying to figure out if th
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00070.html (8,300 bytes)

26. [SECC] Alabama Contest Group and SECC Club Circle (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:40:57 +0000
-- Yes you did, they were quoted by another member of the reflector!
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00071.html (7,720 bytes)

27. [SECC] Who is the Boss? (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:20:53 +0000
__________________ This is why I object so much to this person. He posts messages and apparently has no inclination in the world that the information he asked for is readily available. But, one one t
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00087.html (8,228 bytes)

28. [SECC] [CQ-Contest] Big changes in USA amateur rules will affect CQ WW SSB (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:18:54 +0000
You guys aren't going to believe this release by the FCC, but in essence we've gotten more band space on 80, 40, and 15. And probably more. It's long, but worth reading. And it's effective immediatel
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00100.html (7,805 bytes)

29. [SECC] [CQ-Contest] Big changes in USA amateur rules willaffect CQ WW SSB (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:22:44 +0000
Well, let me amend it a little. I couldn't find the date of release of this ruling, but I seem to remember "30 days" after release is the standard. 73 Ed
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00101.html (7,666 bytes)

30. [SECC] 80 meters (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:49:54 +0000
-- Actually, with a little extra work, it can become a lot easier than using one antenna. I recently completed work on a VB6 project which will counteract the phase differential between a load and pr
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00110.html (7,254 bytes)

31. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:24:21 +0000
-- I modeled the antenna using EZNEC Pro 4.41 and while it is true that higher radiation angles come into effect, the same thing happens if you just omit the lower wire. May be useful in some high de
/archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00144.html (7,046 bytes)

32. [SECC] [SEDXC] K9AY receiving loop (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 22:16:55 +0000
Tad and John, you may be making it a little more complicated than necessary. First of all, you can get pretty good performance IF you use a matching device at the input to the loop , and also a low p
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00021.html (7,687 bytes)

33. [SECC] Fwd: Comcast Subscriber Problems (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:29:05 +0000
Which sounds pretty lame to me as the list owner must have some type of list which could be searched for Comcast customers. Comcast, either by design or inability, has not give me the correct email a
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00043.html (7,828 bytes)

34. [SECC] Fwd: Comcast Subscriber Problems (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 03:32:25 +0000
Well, I got it fixed. Trick is to go to the contesting url, select the ?@contesting.com you want, and then way down on the bottom, there's a button labeled "enable/disable". Mine was set to "disable.
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00050.html (6,992 bytes)

35. [SECC] Notes on 40 and SAC (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:40:15 +0000
Sorry to disagree only on the above, but RTTY software has been available for the last 20 years, and home brew projects to those "green machines" go back to the 60s, as well as commercial Terminal un
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00183.html (9,094 bytes)

36. [SECC] Time Out (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:34:49 +0000
Hal wrote: The list moderator, W4OC, and/or I will send anyone who can't remain non-personal and stay on topic (hint: contesting) a single warning - by private email. Second occurrences will result i
/archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00204.html (6,780 bytes)

37. [SECC] SECC NAQP CW (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:26:17 +0000
I'm going to try a little part time. Still have the big 20 on the ground trying to move it to another tower. Trees grow too fast!! 73 Ed
/archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00000.html (5,494 bytes)

38. [SECC] NAQP (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:00:54 +0000
For the record: 332 Qsos, 88 Multipliers=25760 pts for Team 3 Time on: 9:31 ( I must have been crazy ) Band conditions were absolutely the worst I can remember. Also, participation seemed way down. O
/archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00041.html (6,413 bytes)

39. [SECC] No msgs (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:40:30 +0000
I have not received a single message from any of the @contesting.com reflectors in well over a week. Is something wrong with the reflector? 73 Ed
/archives//html/SECC/2006-08/msg00211.html (5,858 bytes)

40. [SECC] KPC 2400 (score: 59)
Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed)
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 19:34:56 +0000
Does anyone have one of these laying around? Actually, need 2. Forget what that very small Kantronics was, KPC3? Could use that or any controller which has 2400 baud. Please reply direct to me with s
/archives//html/SECC/2006-07/msg00029.html (5,897 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu