- 1. [SECC] any earthlink.net subscribers (score: 170)
- Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:10:49 +0000
- Well, the mindspring server is supposed to have anti-spamming, but if so, it does a damn poor job. You have to sign up on their URL to be part of it. Just got my ADSL running a few hours ago, and boy
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-08/msg00140.html (7,649 bytes)
- 2. [SECC] CQ 160 Claimed Scores (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 22:24:19 -0500
- Most likely cause I can see is he is not a member, according to the membership list. And although this would not present a problem in some contests, he has refused to consider email I have sent him r
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00015.html (6,818 bytes)
- 3. [SECC] CQ 160 Claimed Scores (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 22:32:40 -0500
- I think this is some informal "agreement" to give the SEDXC our scores for the 160, and they supposedly give us theirs in some other contests. I believe it originated because 2 or 3 of our members al
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00016.html (7,093 bytes)
- 4. [SECC] GQP (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 22:42:47 -0500
- The date is unfortunate, but was decided on at an all members meeting at a hamfest. Yep, we have to live with it this year, but after that, no conflicts. We still need to encourage participation and
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00017.html (6,519 bytes)
- 5. [SECC] This weekend's contests (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 15:14:55 -0500
- Good post but the Makrothen Contest allows operation on 80-10. I'm going to be in the Makrothen, but hope to find enough time to also chip in a few points in the ARRL SSB. ( if I can find my mike ) 7
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00030.html (7,164 bytes)
- 6. [SECC] ARRL SSB (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:00:59 -0500
- Well, I operated the RTTY contest on Saturday, and put in a couple of hours on this one as promised. K4SB MODE PHONE ARRL SECTION GA Single transmitter Low TOTAL 101 70 ( ALL on 20,15, 10 ) Score 212
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00040.html (6,646 bytes)
- 7. [SECC] ARRL SSB (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:05:27 -0500
- Single transmitter Low 95 watts sucks. Was going high power, but the cooling fan on the Titan didn't come on and it's not interlocked. Soooooo...tuned up to 1000 watts, and big time smoke started com
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00041.html (6,902 bytes)
- 8. [SECC] Makrothen (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 12:21:27 -0500
- Makrothen Contest Call Used : K4SB Entry Class : Single, All Band, Low Power BAND FSK == 80 0 40 0 20 50 15 64 10 0 Claimed Score: 743488 pts (km) Avg Km Per Q : 6521 Guys, this was really fun. No 59
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00051.html (7,321 bytes)
- 9. [SECC] Makrothen (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 12:24:11 -0500
- Oops, make that 114 Qs. BTW, K4BAI was reported as one of the "bestest" signals on 15 from a DL who kept track. Way to go John. 73 Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00052.html (6,702 bytes)
- 10. [SECC] writelog (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:30:38 -0500
- Well, assuming that Dave is speaking of a "club" call, the second key to activate WL is free for the asking. If not, I hardly think it reasonable to expect a free license. For example, I have keys fo
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00081.html (7,456 bytes)
- 11. [SECC] 2004 GQP Results Update (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:03:49 -0500
- Define "electronically" please. 73 Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00135.html (6,633 bytes)
- 12. [SECC] (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:13:52 -0500
- At present, I will not make the SECC meeting this weekend. But I would like to submit a proxy to someone. Is there a list of new officers running? Have not seen a time yet for the meeting. 73 Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00137.html (6,736 bytes)
- 13. [SECC] (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:08:14 -0500
- Suddenly, my plans have changed. Thanksalot buddies!! Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-03/msg00142.html (6,308 bytes)
- 14. [SECC] Re: WPX contest (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:52:43 -0500
- If Writelog cooperates, I will be using our Club call, NR4X for the contest. Just as a reminder, I have Writelog registered for this call. If someone wants to use it in another contest, just contact
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-02/msg00041.html (5,992 bytes)
- 15. [SECC] RTTY Contest (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:09:42 -0500
- -- NO! No vox is fast enough to keep up with AFSK keying. Also, if you use true FSK, it is impossible to overdrive the rig. Specific instructions on NOT using VOX are on most of the RTTY web pages.
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-02/msg00050.html (6,499 bytes)
- 16. [SECC] Dalton Hamfest (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:17:14 -0500
- I'm planning on going, and maybe do a little tailgating with W4AX and K4VT if the wx is not too bad. If it's the usual cold, will just go inside. Lunch sounds fine. 73 Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-02/msg00059.html (6,499 bytes)
- 17. [SECC] CQ/RJ WPX for NR4X (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 12:35:05 -0500
- Well, the Club call got "baptized". Didn't get to start until about 3 on Saturday because the rig would not key. Worked fine earlier, and still don't know why. Finally built up an FSK interface. QSOs
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-02/msg00061.html (7,047 bytes)
- 18. [Fwd: [SECC] (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:19:51 -0500
- Was just thumbing through the latest CQ and found that the SECC placed 23rd in combined club category. Would have taken about 2 million more points to move us to 21. Still, pretty good. 73 Ed
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-02/msg00090.html (6,128 bytes)
- 19. [SECC] 2004 NAQP RTTY (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:07:06 -0500
- 2004 RTTY North American QSO Party CALL USED___K4SB ARRL SECTION___GA______ band QSOs Mult 80 12 11 40 119 43 20 53 28 15 22 12 10 8 4 TOTAL 214 98 214 QSOs * 98 DX & States, Provinces= 20972 No club
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-02/msg00102.html (6,233 bytes)
- 20. [SECC] Re: [KS4Q-Cluster] TNC Settings (score: 86)
- Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
- Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 11:06:34 -0500
- -- This is a serious issue, but with a simple solution. Download the VE7CC packet program ( and also after installation, download the update ). Then connect to Ernie via the Telnet feature. The Ve7CC
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00012.html (7,336 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu