Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4sb at earthlink.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb: 721 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ earthlink.net: 637 ]

Total 164 documents matching your query.

61. [SECC] Club participation levels (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:29:39 -0500; -- A great idea. But instead of limiting it to encouraging increased participation, why not also ask the question on the reflector, and ask everyone!! who receives the email to quote it back to me? I; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00013.html (6,597 bytes)
62. [SECC] 160 contest (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:31:12 -0500; And if some of you are reading my puny signals on the 160 contest, I'm running about 25 watts into my 80 meter dipole. SWR is off the scale. Let's get in there and work members. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00014.html (6,160 bytes)
63. [SECC] (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 14:56:35 -0500; Well, I think I only worked about 4 AL stations, but was amazed at the number of SC stations. I'm going to break down my log, extract them and then see how many are in the circle. Good ops all, and t; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00026.html (6,352 bytes)
64. [SECC] non-members (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 17:38:39 -0500; -- Woprked him in the 160 and he sounds good. Email for him? 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00031.html (6,566 bytes)
65. [SECC] (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 18:28:21 -0500; OK guys, here it is: ARRL 160 CW 320 Qsos: 44540 points Sections unknown right now, but around 50 Following stations in State indicated were worked: AL W4NTI, K4ZGB, N4NO, KY5R, KA1DWX, KA9EKJ, K4WI,; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00035.html (7,363 bytes)
66. [SECC] (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 23:13:11 -0500; -- Cort may be a member of the SECC, but he was one of the founders of the AL contest group. I think his scores go to them, and even so, he's way outside the circle, so for ARRL, it's a no go. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00041.html (6,431 bytes)
67. [SECC] Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 13:59:49 -0500; Matt, email to you is being bounced by Earthlink. Reply directly to me and I'll resend the file. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00052.html (6,120 bytes)
68. [SECC] (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 14:14:09 -0500; Again, this is a good reason to see who in the circle to the NE is not really supporting the SECC. IF, I sent a general message to the reflector, and asked that it be quoted back to me, we would have; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00053.html (6,733 bytes)
69. [SECC] (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 14:19:33 -0500; OK, I am going to take all members from the web page and run the circle on them again. If you're not listed on the web page, please send me an email. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00054.html (6,416 bytes)
70. [SECC] (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 23:42:30 -0500; -- Maybe a "reflection" from the reflector, but I already did this. And I have written a program which will take any Cabrillo log and extract that information. It's a small exe file which goes in th; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00067.html (6,929 bytes)
71. [SECC]AL group (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 23:45:19 -0500; Just got a message from Cort, K4WI, that they tried, and it just wouldn't fly. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00068.html (6,774 bytes)
72. [SECC] Club Meetings and Other Stuff (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:05:58 -0500; -- And Jeff's suggestion that we meet more often is also good. I have almost 4 acres, a big swimming pool, and would be delighted to have the gang. However, I need to borrow a wife to help me organiz; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00069.html (9,237 bytes)
73. [SECC] Remember when...? (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:21:56 -0500; --snipped Well, Scott may very well have brought up a "historical" perspective, and Lee's comments are pretty accurate. BUT, the rules by the ARRL have changed, the C&BLs as they exist now are worthl; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00070.html (7,352 bytes)
74. [SECC] Remember when...? (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:31:27 -0500; Yep, good article by Dick. But take a look at the SECC web page and click on the C&BLs. 1/4 of the members are required to elect officers? You're kidding....we've never had anything close to 1/4 of t; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00072.html (7,357 bytes)
75. [SECC] Club Meetings and Other Stuff (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:41:26 -0500; I think this is the first time I have ever seen a message attacking another member. Worse from someone I considered a friend. It's not BS, it's not ego, and I hate politics. But I would like to have; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00073.html (7,636 bytes)
76. [SECC] Club Meetings and Other Stuff (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:15:13 -0500; -- Stress of any kind can bring out the worst in all of us, and I have been guilty also at times on other reflectors. But it takes a greater man to admit such. For myself, Lee's apology was both grac; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00079.html (7,505 bytes)
77. [SECC] SECC: Changes? (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:50:29 -0500; Kent McCorkle wrote: Just a few words regarding the current controversy over what the SECC should or should not be. What is the real problem that the SECC is facing? The only one that I've seen menti; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00082.html (8,957 bytes)
78. [SECC] Sorry I missed the fun... (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:55:18 -0500; ku8e@bellsouth.net wrote: Adam, You might want to try to short the center and braid of you dipole together and use it as a "T" antenna on 160 meters. It will work even better if you can lay out some; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00084.html (9,492 bytes)
79. [SECC] Re:C&bls (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:28:04 -0500; The following text is an exact copy of the Constitution and By Laws from the SECC web page. MEETINGS: Article IV The By-Laws shall provide for regular and special meetings, a minimum of one-fourth of; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00085.html (8,824 bytes)
80. [SECC]Scores (score: 86): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:22:54 -0500; -- My fault for a poor choice of words. I already have calls for every RTTY contest, and am going to check my CQs for others. NCJ and others also. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00094.html (7,416 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]