Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lee.hiers: 133 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ gmail.com: 1203 ]

Total 133 documents matching your query.

61. [SECC] GQP County Update (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:37:48 -0400
Negative. I've got a gig on Saturday (http://www.myspace.com/sallybarris). Possibly Sunday, but I wouldn't count on it. -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel"
/archives//html/SECC/2008-03/msg00109.html (6,496 bytes)

62. [SECC] GQP Rover thoughts and two questions (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:10:04 -0500
Yes, the level of involvement matters. As long as you have no assistance in sending or receiving or mult spotting type activities you're OK. You could have an in-house tech repairing radios and anten
/archives//html/SECC/2008-02/msg00026.html (7,426 bytes)

63. [SECC] SECC vs SEDXC (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:02:18 -0500
Only for 160 contests. On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Ralph Bates K1ZZI <k1zzi at comcast.net> wrote: -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel"
/archives//html/SECC/2008-02/msg00094.html (6,624 bytes)

64. [SECC] AA4GA - NAQP (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:35:56 -0500
I had 100 Qs X 50 mults for 5,000 points in ~2 hours. SECC #3. -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel"
/archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00056.html (6,105 bytes)

65. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:06:11 -0500
Bellsouth doesn't allow incoming mail connections from mail servers with dynamic IPs. There are many ISPs that do this and other measures to "protect" their customers....unfortunately. -- Lee Hiers,
/archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00062.html (7,155 bytes)

66. [SECC] Bellsouth (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:28:32 -0500
I fully understand their reason. I don't doubt that 90% of the email I receive is from spammers; I no longer count it. I administer a 2700-address opt-in email list for a monthly newsletter and each
/archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00065.html (8,822 bytes)

67. [SECC] Romney's comments (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:20:58 -0500
Are you talking about the SECC? When did it become a 501c3? No kidding! Of course most of us don't have the entire US military available at the touch of a red button! I believe our current president
/archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00096.html (8,002 bytes)

68. [SECC] GQP re-defined (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:57:13 -0500
I thought that was a pretty funny comment too...guess you're an "over-the-hill" contester now, like most of us! ;-) -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel"
/archives//html/SECC/2007-12/msg00102.html (7,317 bytes)

69. [SECC] CX Exchange QRM (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:17:01 -0500
Interesting, as *they* are running a contest. My suggestion would be for a CW event, the last full weekend of October. Phone, the last full weekend of November. Minor contests, such as this and most
/archives//html/SECC/2007-12/msg00122.html (6,875 bytes)

70. [SECC] ATT mail and aluminum masts (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:49:50 -0500
I administer a 2700-address email newsletter list. Most ISPs these days consider that if you're trying to send that many emails in a short period of time you must be up to no good, so I've had to res
/archives//html/SECC/2007-12/msg00155.html (8,176 bytes)

71. [SECC] SS CW AA4GA Single Op LP (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 21:28:31 -0500
ARRL Sweepstakes Contest, CW Call: AA4GA Class: Single Op LP Operating Time (hrs): ~6 Summary: Band QSOs -- 80: 58 40: 194 20: 67 15: 31 -- Total: 350 Sections = 74 Total Score = 51,800 Club: South E
/archives//html/SECC/2007-11/msg00008.html (6,475 bytes)

72. [SECC] cq-contest debate on SS ck (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:34:58 -0500
The proliferation of useless debates is why I haven't subscribed to cq-contest in a couple years. I don't have the time for it. I don't know if they're arguing trying to shorten the SS exchange or no
/archives//html/SECC/2007-11/msg00028.html (6,963 bytes)

73. [SECC] Section Abbreviation for Quebec (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:35:47 -0500
You've answered your own question! PQ is an obsolete abbreviation....but I imagine some prefer it. ;-) -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel"
/archives//html/SECC/2007-11/msg00038.html (6,778 bytes)

74. [SECC] SS SSB - KB4KBS (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:48:35 -0500
<SNIP> That's part of the masochism. "Later" is just that: later. QRM changes. QRN changes. Propagation changes. Any one of which may allow a QSO in 15 minutes that is impossible at present. If you'r
/archives//html/SECC/2007-11/msg00063.html (7,208 bytes)

75. [SECC] AA4GA - CQWW CW - SOAB Assisted (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:21:12 -0500
CQ Worldwide DX Contest, CW Call: AA4GA Class: SOAB(A) LP Operating Time (hrs): who knows? 5 minutes here, 20 minutes there Summary: Band QSOs Zones Countries -- 80: 7 6 7 40: 73 15 54 20: 85 25 57 1
/archives//html/SECC/2007-11/msg00080.html (6,669 bytes)

76. [SECC] Circle Vote (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:03:14 -0400
Dang...looks like I missed the deadline by 2 hours. Doesn't really matter I suppose. Vote affirmative for the proposed circle anyway. -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel"
/archives//html/SECC/2007-10/msg00071.html (6,182 bytes)

77. [SECC] CW Sprint Announcement (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:51:15 -0400
Yes. The site with the page you were looking for is down, as you indicated in your original post. -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA "Have Dobro Will Travel"
/archives//html/SECC/2007-09/msg00036.html (6,741 bytes)

78. [SECC] Fw: NAQP SSB KU8E Single Op HP (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:19:06 -0400
Yuck... That really would ruin it for those of us that don't run amplifiers...and this is the only contest where we are on a "more even" playing field power-wise. It's been a while, but I'm pretty su
/archives//html/SECC/2007-08/msg00059.html (8,161 bytes)

79. [SECC] Fw: NAQP SSB KU8E Single Op HP (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:13:47 -0400
Actually, probably not. What makes a difference is propagation and the angle of radiation. What's the difference between a big antenna and a little antenna on 40m - 4 or 5 db? Difference between 100w
/archives//html/SECC/2007-08/msg00077.html (9,905 bytes)

80. [SECC] Fw: NAQP SSB KU8E Single Op HP (score: 71)
Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:46:28 -0400
No one has said that stations with better antenna systems don't have an advantage. That wasn't your argument, raising the power limit was. I thought you said that those guys running folks on scatter
/archives//html/SECC/2007-08/msg00085.html (8,442 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu