Mail Archive Search: <+from:n4uk@mindspring.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n4uk@mindspring.com: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

21. [SECC] SECC NAQP CW Teams (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:51:12 -0500; SECC #1 -- AA4LR Bill GA K4NO Greg AL K9AY Gary GA KA9EKJ Roger AL K4WI Court AL SECC #2 -- W4ATL Sherman GA K4SB Ed GA K2UFT Dick GA NE4S Mike GA W4NTI Dan AL SECC #3 -- W4WA Ron GA AE4Y Kent GA K4G; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00049.html (7,963 bytes)
22. [SECC] CQ 160 (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 07:52:55 -0500; Dear SECC & Others, I think we have everyone in the club onboard with submitting their scores with the SEDXC label. Again, you don't have to be a member of the SEDXC to submit your score to them. I w; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00067.html (8,999 bytes)
23. [SECC] naqp cw w4oc m/2 lp (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 13:46:18 -0500; Yeah. It's a damn shame too. If we (W4OC)would have worked our own state in the NAQP we would have at least been ahead of N0NI M2. Between Don, Ron and myself we spoke to at least 4 different SC stat; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00098.html (8,807 bytes)
24. [SECC] naqp cw w4oc m/2 lp (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:08:46 -0500; I forgot all about you Joe! If I would have remembered, I would have called you on Saturday morning and begged you to get on and work us. I'm about as guilty as anyone about getting on. I can only do; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00102.html (8,627 bytes)
25. [SECC] Re: Multi mistakes?? (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:17:30 -0500; Ken, Let's get some discussion started here.. What Multi op mistakes did you make? What about the guys at W4AN? ( I guess if you WIN the contest, you made less mistakes than the other folks...) Maybe; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00113.html (7,094 bytes)
26. [SECC] NA/CT question (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:35:05 -0500; Does anyone know if a line can be selected from the bandmap on CT or NA so the radio qsys instantly to that frequency?? I could not figute out how to do this or if it can even be done with either sof; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00114.html (6,762 bytes)
27. [SECC] N4UK TOKEN EFFORT CQ160CW (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:48:33 -0500; Got home late Friday from a weeklong trip in Ft Myers, Florida. I just had way too many things to catch up on at work to allow a serious effort in this one. Operating time was 1.3 Hours from around 1; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00220.html (6,903 bytes)
28. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:43:16 -0500; but N4PN and I'm sure a host of others. Since we seem to be able to do business via the internet, I move that we immediately define ourselves as an ARRL section. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00254.html (9,789 bytes)
29. [SECC] Logging ? (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:13:56 -0500; My advice is to just get on and do it. Put away the pen and paper and head straight into the fire. I had the same fear when I first tried it but now it's almost instinctive. It still takes a few qsos; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00256.html (9,422 bytes)
30. [SECC] Logging ? (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:14:15 -0500; I have to disagree. I use two fingers for typing. One on each hand. I can type as fast as I need for a cw or SB contest with NA or CT. Touch typing is not a requirement for being a good contester. Ke; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00265.html (9,443 bytes)
31. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:18:38 -0500; But California, Texas and Florida are not entire sections. Florida has 3, Texas has Three and California has a bunch. These new requirements were not written for these states. I'd say they were writt; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00267.html (11,035 bytes)
32. [SECC] 46 radials now on vertical/FT1000MP S/N observation (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 14:02:23 -0500; Hello to all, I spent a good portion of Saturday putting up a 500 ft East/West beverage and laying out 16 more radials to the 1/4wl tower vertical. I recorded the SWR changes after adding radials in; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00007.html (9,112 bytes)
33. [SECC] PI4COM relief fund donation? (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 14:17:38 -0500; Anyone interested in making a donation to PI4COM? See the notes below. I'd be willing to collect donations and mail it to KC1XX as an SECC donation unless someone else would rather do this. I will st; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00025.html (9,397 bytes)
34. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 17:14:57 -0500; We are still on for the M/S though I have yet to hear back from AA4NN. The new vertical appears to be working well as I was copied by the XU7 this morning on 160 and have been easily working whatever; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00033.html (8,013 bytes)
35. [SECC] N4UK M/S ARRL 160M (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 09:42:03 -0500; The first test of the new antenna system and new beverage antennas @ N4UK. Operators- AA4NN, AA4S, N4UK Ant- 1/4wl vertical, 46 1/4wl radials. Rx antennas- 500 ft beverages. Rigs=FT1000mps,Amp=AL1200; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00050.html (7,338 bytes)
36. No subject (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 09:43:06 -0500; The first test of the new antenna system and new beverage antennas @ N4UK. Operators- AA4NN, AA4S, N4UK Ant- 1/4wl vertical, 46 1/4wl radials. Rx antennas- 500 ft beverages. Rigs=FT1000mps,Amp=AL1200; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00051.html (7,242 bytes)
37. [SECC] 160m contest observations/ lessons learned (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:48:10 -0500; After looking at the data and giving some thought to what went on over the weekend I have come up with a list of tactical decisions we made at N4UK during the weekend that may have hurt us. I'll also; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00078.html (9,023 bytes)
38. [SECC] ARRL 160 2002 (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:14:17 -0500; I can quickly think of a great contest location that is great for 160m operations! Mine! WP3X has always done great in the contests it participates in. The "Big" hurricane 3 years ago messed up the q; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00090.html (9,737 bytes)
39. [SECC] RE: [SEDXC] CQWW 160 CW Contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:04:36 -0500; I believe the 2 Clubs are not compatible in their design. It's all fine about joining, but just how members of the SECC can stand the drive to a Club meeting? It's a 2 hour drive for me, and I can th; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00131.html (8,476 bytes)
40. [SECC] Yeasu FT-1000MP Mods (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 17:24:03 -0500; Which mod are you suggesting not installing???? I installed the AGC Mod which changes the attack time constant and it made a dramatic difference when the AGC was in the fast position and I was handli; /archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00194.html (7,440 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]