Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w4an@CONTESTING.COM: 215 ]

Total 215 documents matching your query.

101. [SECC] CW SECC Members (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:41:50 -0500 (EST)
Oops... make that the FCG not FRC. 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@c
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00183.html (7,567 bytes)

102. [SECC] NAQP CW Team Registration Confirmation (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:58:03 -0500 (EST)
Hello, This E-Mail to is to confirm receipt of your January 2002 NAQP CW Team registration. Log submissions will be confirmed via seperate E-Mail confirmation. Thanks! 73, Bob K6ZZ Club: -- SECC on t
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00184.html (7,582 bytes)

103. [SECC] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] ARLB007 ARRL Board AdoptsModified Novice Band Refarming Plan (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:30:54 -0500 (EST)
I like to hang out on 80M CW in the winter. There are times that I can call CQ for 15 minutes with a KW and not get an answer on 3525Khz. I'm absolutely sure if I CQ'd on 3695Khz, I would never get a
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00193.html (9,137 bytes)

104. [SECC] CQ 160 Activity (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 08:58:40 -0500 (EST)
Gary, Here are the folks that I heard from... W4AN @ W8JI SOHP Full Time W4NTI ?? Part time K4OGG SO?? Part time N4UK SOHP Part time K9AY SO?? 90% AA4LR SOLP Part time K4GA SOLP ?? K4BAI SOHP Part ti
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00197.html (8,087 bytes)

105. [SECC] CQ 160 Activity (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:14:23 -0500 (EST)
Oops... Archie (K4GA) said "part time". Forgot to update. 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00198.html (8,812 bytes)

106. [SECC] CQ 160 Activity (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 20:25:45 -0500 (EST)
I must have not saved that file after updating it. I know Rick and Ed were on there. Sorry guys. -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative reques
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00205.html (10,052 bytes)

107. [SECC] CQ 160 Activity (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:37:01 -0500 (EST)
Technically I think he is wrong. CW is allowed anywhere. Yes? 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00211.html (8,120 bytes)

108. [SECC] CQ 160 @ W8JI by W4AN (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:43:21 -0500 (EST)
SOHP Exact numbers to follow. The floppy I had the log on turned out to be bad when I got home. 1320 QSOs and 107 multipliers for about 516K. Missed OH0, JY, LY, YL, EU, LA, OH, and many other common
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00225.html (7,502 bytes)

109. [SECC] Southern Sprint Coalition (SSC) (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:06:52 -0500 (EST)
Hello All! I'll try to keep this short... Name: Southern Sprint Coalition -- Anyone have a problem with this name? Please feel free to suggest others. I put very little thought in to it. Purpose -- T
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00240.html (10,501 bytes)

110. [SECC] Southern Sprint Coalition (SSC) (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:34:09 -0500 (EST)
You are leaving for 40 meters to early. 40M is like the gold rush. Once you hear others there, you feel like you have to follow. I know for sure that if I don't have close to 120 QSOs on 20 meters I
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00245.html (7,444 bytes)

111. [SECC] Southern Sprint Coalition (SSC) (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:47:22 -0500 (EST)
The only problem with this is that we have 5's, 4's, 8's, and even a 3. But I really don't care about the name. Whatever you all think is fine with me. 73 -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.c
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00264.html (7,471 bytes)

112. [SECC] SEDXC name ? (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:14:07 -0500 (EST)
No, I didn't say that. I will, however, question whether we should do it next year based on the activity from the SEDXC members. I am going to put SEDXC on my log. 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00274.html (7,952 bytes)

113. [SECC] ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:07:38 -0500 (EST)
Looks like AA4GA is busy this coming weekend and won't be able to make it to my place. KS5M expressed some interest in coming up, but I won't have time to get up there and show him the station and ge
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00016.html (6,741 bytes)

114. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:24:57 -0500 (EST)
W2GD sent me a message and warned me that they would be multi-op from a new QTH. He says it is in a salt water swamp area and they have high hopes of doing big things this year. Since they were not Q
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00028.html (7,823 bytes)

115. [SECC] ARRL 160 tomorrow (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:31:30 -0500 (EST)
Call CQ 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00036.html (9,008 bytes)

116. [SECC] ARRL160 W8JI(W4AN) SO HP (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:56:38 -0500 (EST)
QSOs Sections Countries Total: 1488 All 117 = 394,875 Didn't work K4SB. How is that possible? 73 Bill, W4AN -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administra
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00055.html (6,715 bytes)

117. [SECC] 160m contest observations/ lessons learned (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:57:28 -0500 (EST)
Last year and this year I was on 1824.7 or so. Both nights. W8JI's callsign results in very few challenges for frequency. Suggest you get on the air more and when people go "Oh, its N4UK" you will ha
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00079.html (9,985 bytes)

118. [SECC] ARRL 160 2002 (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:38:40 -0500 (EST)
Gary & all, I think you did a great job of organizing the troops Gary. Clearly there were guys making QSOs that wouldn not have otherwise. I don't know if we will win this thing or not, but I do thin
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00084.html (8,686 bytes)

119. [SECC] Re: Hi again (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:44:51 -0500 (EST)
One thing I would like to point out... Last year in ARRL CW, 10 meters opened to Europe at European sunrise producing 20db over S-9 signals to some parts of Europe. Mostly southern Europe. This was t
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00088.html (6,723 bytes)

120. [SECC] RE: [SEDXC] CQWW 160 CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:59:16 -0500 (EST)
I think a joint endevour would be good for both clubs. Our membership would surely increase from SEDXers who spill over into other contests and our club would only be out of ONE very small contest. M
/archives//html/SECC/2001-12/msg00130.html (10,743 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu