Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w4atl: 126 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ arrl.net: 1250 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] FW: [CQ-Contest] NCJ contest results (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks)
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 06:32:20 -0500
Looks like the teams for the August 2002 CW competition were not registered. Bummer. All, The July/August 2002 NAQP SSB and CW scores are now posted on the NCJ web site (www.ncjweb.com). Click on CON
/archives//html/SECC/2003-07/msg00004.html (7,964 bytes)

2. [SECC] PZ Dxpedition (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks)
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:36:25 -0500
Great idea! I would like to solicit funds for my wife's and my DXpedition to KH6. Hey, at least my wife is a ham... And my wife and I would like a DXpedition through the Alaska waterway next year...
/archives//html/SECC/2003-07/msg00021.html (7,180 bytes)

3. [SECC] Re:ARRL 160 (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:50:49 -0500
My certificate for SS Phone LP came in about one month ago with the Division Leader label on it! Unfortunately, the division leader labels are no longer the distinctive yellow sticker of years past.
/archives//html/SECC/2003-07/msg00065.html (6,848 bytes)

4. [SECC] Some wind damage (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks)
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 07:41:19 -0500
I lost my 40M dipole in the storm, which is not a big deal. However, yesterday afternoon I discovered that on the way to the ground it took part of the roof mounted tribander with it. I don't know ye
/archives//html/SECC/2003-07/msg00083.html (8,927 bytes)

5. [SECC] Some wind damage (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks)
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 07:46:44 -0500
My 40M antenna got wrapped around my tri-bander and my 80M dipole came down. Spent Friday morning putting them back up. Then my computer blew up! Poof goes the power supply. I think it also took the
/archives//html/SECC/2003-07/msg00084.html (9,439 bytes)

6. [SECC] Dayton (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks)
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 18:52:44 -0500
I will be driving up tomorrow. I am going to the contest banquet and I will be at the contest forums. I am fired up and ready to shop. Hi... Is anyone else in SECC going to Dayton ??? I am flying up
/archives//html/SECC/2003-05/msg00019.html (6,755 bytes)

7. [SECC] WPX-CW (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks)
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:19:46 -0500
Looks like I will be on some Sunday. My usual DXing S&P. Who's in? I haven't decided. I'll be LP, maybe full time (maybe not). 73, Jay/K4OGG _______________________________________________ SECC maili
/archives//html/SECC/2003-05/msg00038.html (7,403 bytes)

8. [SECC] SECC Meeting (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks (W4ATL))
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:17:50 -0500
Let me know where and when and I'll try to make it. Hi, Is there any interest in another informal SECC meeting/lunch ??? I think the last one we had was up in Dunwoody about a month and half ago was
/archives//html/SECC/2003-03/msg00046.html (7,533 bytes)

9. [SECC] Doug Smith, KF6DX, to speak at Georgia Tech (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks (W4ATL))
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:15:52 -0500
Doug Smith will be speaking at the Georgia Tech Amateur Radio Club tonight, March 10 at 7 PM in the Old Architecture Auditorium on the campus of Georgia Tech. KF6DX has been active in HF digital comm
/archives//html/SECC/2003-03/msg00052.html (8,218 bytes)

10. [SECC] SECC DX SSB (score: 70)
Author: w4atl at arrl.net (Sherman Banks (W4ATL))
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:04:45 -0500
With your weak signal, you'll mainly S&P. Especially in the beginning of the contest. You may be able to CQ on Sunday when the big boys are desperate for additional QSOs. Make any contact you want. B
/archives//html/SECC/2003-02/msg00112.html (8,142 bytes)

11. [SECC] SSSSB (score: 6)
Author: w4atl at earthlink.net (Sherman Banks)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:38:38 -0500
As I understand it, U is Single Op with Packet. With the multiple people you are having over to operate, you would be an M.
/archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00159.html (10,144 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu