Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w4nti@mindspring.com: 224 ]

Total 224 documents matching your query.

21. [SECC] W4NTI SS Phone (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:43:22 -0600
Good contest. Good conditions. All sections accounted for. 603 QSO 80 Mults 96480 Dan/W4NTI -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/ht
/archives//html/SECC/2002-11/msg00082.html (6,058 bytes)

22. [SECC] Antenna Wax (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:40:32 -0600
Ok since were passing out the secrets.....every night, at midnight, before a major contest event I sacrifice a goat on my antenna field. Dan/W4NTI
/archives//html/SECC/2002-11/msg00083.html (7,455 bytes)

23. [SECC] Antenna Wax (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:26:51 -0600
With those dimensions you do not have a G5RV. A G6RV is a 102 foot flat-top fed with 33 foot of 300 ohm ribbon. To a random length of 70 ohm coax. Dan/W4NTI is a great the clear. still have and the t
/archives//html/SECC/2002-11/msg00089.html (10,017 bytes)

24. [SECC] SS SSB 2002 N4LR (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:30:38 -0600
For some reason the close in stuff was the hardest to work. One of my last sections was KY and Georgia. Dan/W4NTI (Alabama) Single Op, Low Power, FT1000MP (100 W) and gap vertical with 2 radials. 720
/archives//html/SECC/2002-11/msg00090.html (7,756 bytes)

25. [SECC] Re: SSB SS (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:15:18 -0600
Sorry Ed. Entering under the handicap rules only apply in golf...hi . Good work. Dan/W4NTI
/archives//html/SECC/2002-11/msg00105.html (8,224 bytes)

26. [SECC] CQ WW CW Plans (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:23:15 -0600
Condolances on your losses Bill. Dan/W4NTI
/archives//html/SECC/2002-11/msg00106.html (8,296 bytes)

27. [SECC] virus at large (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 18:55:57 -0600
I remember that one too. But I dumped it. Since I didnt' know a Roger Hackler that would send me a card. I also have Zone Alarm so hopefully nothing got sent out of here. Dan/W4NTI Roger to five Roge
/archives//html/SECC/2002-11/msg00115.html (7,399 bytes)

28. [SECC] Feeding 160 Meter Antenna (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:43:20 -0600
properties as possible. Feeding a "T" will mean several excursions to get it right. They tend to be a bit touchy from what I recall. Course it should play well. FWIts worth department. I put up a In
/archives//html/SECC/2002-11/msg00146.html (9,395 bytes)

29. [SECC] California QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:20:21 -0500
Anyone participate in the CQP this past weekend? I made 218 qso with 54 mults. Dan/W4NTI -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version:
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00010.html (6,436 bytes)

30. [SECC] PA QSO PARTY (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:41:48 -0500
Single op Medium power < 150w All bands. Total QSO 117 Total Mults 46 Claimed score 7544 Good conditions and activity. One of the better state contests. Dan/W4NTI -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00016.html (6,384 bytes)

31. [SECC] minor correction (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:30:42 -0700
What a pity....I thought I had a chance at a good score if only I could operate two weekends...grin. Dan/W4NTI a
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00034.html (6,768 bytes)

32. [SECC] Re: CQWW (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:55:26 -0700
Sounds like a fun time for all. I'll probably be on but don't know for how long. Conditions are supposed to be good. So maybe you will have a good contest. Dan/W4NTI doing our interested be =)
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00035.html (7,634 bytes)

33. [SECC] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:37:44 -0500
For what its worth...I vote for 3 October. Dan/W4NTI the with or other not I
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00052.html (10,417 bytes)

34. [SECC] DX Cluster (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:32:25 -0500
I lost the address to the dx cluster. Can someone provide please?? Dan/W4NTI -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00060.html (5,961 bytes)

35. [SECC] Cluster (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:47:34 -0500
Thanks for all the replies guys. Good luck this weekend. Dan/W4NTI -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00071.html (5,914 bytes)

36. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:45:37 -0600
The problem with 80 cw is the lack of active stations in the SE. I think most folks are cutting their antennas for 75 ssb and forgetting about the cw band. Also the noise is quite intense until you g
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00116.html (21,197 bytes)

37. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:33:12 -0600
I don't see how a cw traffic net, operating perhaps 5 to 15 minutes, seperated by 3 to 4 hours per session could qrm the band enough to stop other 80 meter activity. If a CW net started up at say 7pm
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00121.html (8,529 bytes)

38. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:00:11 -0600
Glad too. Nothing special really. Its around 190 feet ( maybe 195). Ive had it up in various configerations. But I find that if you get the vertical up about 50' it seems to talk best. Run the rest o
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00123.html (25,174 bytes)

39. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:22:35 -0600
Oh I forgot to mention I also have the shield of the coax and the return ground wire connected to a 8' copper ground rod at the feedpoint. Dan/W4NTI about fine. think the parties. 20 a there as the t
/archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00126.html (27,733 bytes)

40. [SECC] Kenwood TS-830S problem (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 11:36:20 -0500
Go get yourself some contact cleaner. Spray all the switches and the small interconnecting wire pins. May can just pull them loose and stick them back together. You probably have some corrosion from
/archives//html/SECC/2002-09/msg00013.html (8,467 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu