Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+160M\s+Ant\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+160M\s+Ant\s+Question\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] 160M Ant Question (score: 1): Author: w4dd at arrl.net (Jeff W4DD); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 13:51:40 -0500; I've had great luck using a 160M quarter wave vertical shot up over some tall trees. It's a pain putting it up each fall. I don't leave it up all year because the moving branch tend to destroy it ove; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00130.html (6,972 bytes)
2. [SECC] 160M Ant Question (score: 1): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 13:41:21 -0600; An inverted vee at 50 ft for 160 won't be a very good antenna for DX. You can work some but it will be a struggle, especially in a contest. It will be OK for stateside contacts. I used exactly that a; /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00131.html (9,764 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]