Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Band\s+plans\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Band\s+plans\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Band plans (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:11:39 -0400; CQ and Bob Cox, K3EST Director of Contests have no plans to get into band plans. This means that if you can transmit on a frequency and the mode is not restricted then its valid. This applies to all; /archives//html/SECC/2001-10/msg00069.html (6,767 bytes)
2. [SECC] Band plans (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:25:42 -0400; You know, David, it's not CQ you have to worry about. It's how Hollingsworth is going to react to all the reports of stations "operating contrary to the bandplan." If hams get fined for this during t; /archives//html/SECC/2001-10/msg00070.html (7,370 bytes)
3. [SECC] Band plans (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:37:35 +0000; I agree totally with Bill on his operating plans, but current FCC regulations clearly state what modes are available and where. Hollingsworth does not, contrary to the ARRL, and his own opinions, hav; /archives//html/SECC/2001-10/msg00072.html (7,221 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]