Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+EPC\s+PSK63\s+QSO\s+Party\s+2006\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+EPC\s+PSK63\s+QSO\s+Party\s+2006\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] EPC PSK63 QSO Party 2006 (score: 1): Author: euroradio at yandex.ru (euroradio); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:40:42 +0400 (MSD); EPC PSK63 QSO Party - Rules 2006 Sponsor: European PSK Club URL: www.eu.srars.org Email: eudx at scotham.net ________________________________ DATE AND TIME Starting time is at 00:00 UTC, and ending t; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00030.html (10,857 bytes)
2. [SECC] EPC PSK63 QSO Party 2006 (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:23:19 -0400; Geez another digital mode PSK63 (BPSK63). I have used PSK31 and its good but got flack from Pactor and Amtor people a couple of years ago. Why can't digital be standardized on one mode like CW, SSB,; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00032.html (6,718 bytes)
3. [SECC] EPC PSK63 QSO Party 2006 (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:24:04 -0500; It's called experemental Dave. It will eventually settle down I am sure. Just curious, why did you get flack from the Pactor and Amtor guys? Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00042.html (7,468 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]