Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Electronic\s+QSLs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Electronic\s+QSLs\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Electronic QSLs (score: 1): Author: jpryor@arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:01:41 +0100; I know that the last thing some of you might want is more QSLs, but you might check out this new (to me at least) web site which posts electronic QSLs. I was surprised when I went to the site for the; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00088.html (6,878 bytes)
2. [SECC] Electronic QSLs (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:13:07 -0700; Clearly ARRL does not accept these electronic QSLs. That's why there is a message on the website asking us to e-mail NT1N at ARRL asking him to get ARRL to accept them. At this time, I suspect it is; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00091.html (7,280 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]