Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fw\:\s+Important\s+changes\s+to\s+ARRL\s+Club\s+rules\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com (K9AY)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:38:41 -0500
News from the ARRL regarding club competition...Gary, K9AY -- -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Pro
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00243.html (10,335 bytes)

2. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:49:05 -0500
So, we remain under the old rules until the end of October. This will certainly cut down on the amount of work the Secretary has to do. Which leaves us with an an interesting proposition for the SECC
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00244.html (9,704 bytes)

3. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:19:18 +0000
This is great news! Not only will we finally! be able to pick up K4WI, but N4PN and I'm sure a host of others. Since we seem to be able to do business via the internet, I move that we immediately def
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00247.html (8,294 bytes)

4. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com (K9AY)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:31:15 -0500
Ed Note that a club cannot do both175-mile and ARRL section. I am in favor of keeping the 175-mile definition. We would lose more good members from AL, SC and NC than we would gain from only includin
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00248.html (8,944 bytes)

5. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: JChmiel490@aol.com (JChmiel490@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:43:41 EST
Gary, Since I'm from SC I would really prefer to keep the 175 Mile rule. I don't think there is enough contest activity here in SC to form a separate group. Of course it will be up to the majority. J
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00249.html (8,527 bytes)

6. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: SavageBR@aol.com (SavageBR@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:56:52 EST
--part1_16b.7f5f871.29897fd4_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I would obviously vote for the new "Section" selection. Bruce AA4Z, 202 miles out. -
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00250.html (9,489 bytes)

7. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:43:16 -0500
but N4PN and I'm sure a host of others. Since we seem to be able to do business via the internet, I move that we immediately define ourselves as an ARRL section. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00254.html (9,789 bytes)

8. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: W4OC@aol.com (W4OC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:01:15 EST
hmmmm.... let's see.... if you take out N4UK, K4AB, K4NO, AA4S, W4OC, W2JCC, etc. the SECC club scores will definitely go down. N4UK and i can start the South Carolina Contest Club! whose idea was th
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00255.html (8,818 bytes)

9. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: k4ab@msn.com (Larry Crim)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:55:16 -0600
--=_NextPart_001_0000_01C1A9AE.E48F8860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I think this change was written for the benefit of California Texas and Florida. Not us. Or YCCC or FRC. I vote
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00260.html (13,855 bytes)

10. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:10:37 -0600
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0136_01C1A9B1.0961E280 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't know what the e
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00261.html (17,340 bytes)

11. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:23:01 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --__JNP_000_458f.6467.4cb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00262.html (11,534 bytes)

12. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: k4no@home.com (greg and leann richard)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:16:00 -0600
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_00CC_01C1A9DB.B30EAD20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dan, If the SECC Club s
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00266.html (22,550 bytes)

13. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:18:38 -0500
But California, Texas and Florida are not entire sections. Florida has 3, Texas has Three and California has a bunch. These new requirements were not written for these states. I'd say they were writt
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00267.html (11,035 bytes)

14. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:23:51 +0000
In the first place, I realize the value of all our members, and would hate to see some excluded. In the second place, I am distinctly under the impression that the rule change did NOT mention section
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00276.html (9,620 bytes)

15. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:32:28 -0500
it section not division... http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2002/01/29/1/?nc=1 Gordon -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-RE
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00277.html (10,553 bytes)

16. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:45:15 +0000
It is sections, not divisions. Keep what we have, but realign the circle. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00278.html (8,027 bytes)

17. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:11:34 -0600
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0038_01C1AA58.CEBFBA00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good points Greg...OK y
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00283.html (25,349 bytes)

18. [SECC] Fw: Important changes to ARRL Club rules (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:47:36 -0500
No, I think that may have been a factor, but the process may have started with the TCG. These poor guys live in a state that's what, 450 miles long? There's no way to manage 175 mile radius to includ
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00288.html (8,601 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu