Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+NAQP\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+NAQP\s+CW\s*$/: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

41. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: Matt@tenn-valley.com (Matt Lee, WB6BWZ); Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:17:57 -0500; Hi Cort, I also use WriteLog (v10.38D) for my primary RTTY, CW & SSB contest software. For PSK31, I prefer freeware DigiPan <http://www.DigiPan.net/> because WriteLog does not have a waterfall displa; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00065.html (9,585 bytes)
42. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: w4atl@arrl.net (Sherman Banks (W4ATL)); Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 05:29:53 -0500; I use Writelog and DXBase and I am happy with both programs. Writelog has been very stable for use full time in contests. --Original Message-- From: secc-admin@contesting.com [mailto:secc-admin@conte; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00067.html (8,243 bytes)
43. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@contesting.com (Lee Hiers, AA4GA); Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:54:10 -0500; TR -- Lee Hiers, AA4GA Cornelia, GA mailto:aa4ga@contesting.com; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00068.html (7,268 bytes)
44. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: jpryor@arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:06:24 -0500; Me too. Jay/K4OGG; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00069.html (7,475 bytes)
45. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: knason@emeraldis.com (Kevan Nason); Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:58:10 -0500; Use Writelog here. Very happy with it. Never (knock, knock) crashed yet. Using dual monitors now which really made a difference. Will be on this weekend as "Ken". Hope to see everyone and good luck.; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00074.html (7,194 bytes)
46. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 10:02:25 -0500; I think I replied directly to whoever started this thread, but it appears that everyone wants to know what the others are using, so I will post this to the reflector. I use NA for everything that I c; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00078.html (7,680 bytes)
47. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k0dq@analog.org (Scott Redd K0DQ); Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 15:48:05 -0500; Minor clarification. . . I (K0DQ) haven't lost a log using TR although I recall someone else saying they had. My experience related to the need (in my opinion) for a bit of "sailor proofing" of TR. I; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00082.html (8,634 bytes)
48. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k0dq@analog.org (Scott Redd K0DQ); Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:41:06 -0500; Dang, you're right! Was thinking about big logs. Mea culpa For the reflector. . . NEVER question the Judge's memory. . . this is my second violation. . . hope John doesn't practice "three strikes and; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00099.html (7,782 bytes)
49. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k4sb@earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:18:07 +0000; Saw on TV the other evening that they are thinking about resuming the draft. With that in mind, never question the Judge or a Vice Admiral! 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00101.html (7,613 bytes)
50. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k4ab@msn.com (Larry Crim); Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:22:50 -0500; Looks like I'm free this weekend. Bill, put me down for a team. Will = be fulltime. =20 Its been awhile since I've done NAQP, and I don't think I've EVER done th= e August versions...only January. =2; /archives//html/SECC/2002-08/msg00004.html (6,669 bytes)
51. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 21:36:22 -0400; Hello all: Well, given the quality of the guys on my team, my goal was to not be the lowest score on the team. It seems likely that I failed in that regard. Had problem with bad spot on rotator and r; /archives//html/SECC/2002-08/msg00029.html (8,339 bytes)
52. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: w4atl@arrl.net (Sherman Banks (W4ATL)); Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:40:14 -0400; Sorry for the delay in reporting my score. I didn't do as well as last year. My 160 antenna is much worse with only 2 QSOs. And my 40M dipole I put up for this contest developed a problem. Oh well. S; /archives//html/SECC/2002-08/msg00053.html (6,538 bytes)
53. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:31:56 -0500; Regarding NAQP CW, I have heard from K4GA who wants to be put on a part-time or "taxi squad" team for SECC for NAQP CW. He is having trouble posting to the reflector for some reason. 73, John, K4BAI.; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00042.html (6,575 bytes)
54. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:04:14 +0000; Well, on the many posts regardig this, I have asked to be part of a "part time" team. I have yet to receive a reply. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00050.html (6,780 bytes)
55. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:37:20 -0500 (EST); Please note my post yesterday which included your callsign and many others. I didn't think I needed to reply to each message. Sorry for the confusion. 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesti; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00051.html (7,568 bytes)
56. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:03:23 -0500; 2 light fixtures installed in Breakfast room. Fluorescent light installed in Kitchen. Put tile down in shack in preparation for wood stove. It's too cold to contest without an amplifier. Ran 110 line; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00086.html (6,793 bytes)
57. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: w4atl@arrl.net (Sherman Banks); Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:23:11 -0400; Well, a bad lightening storm cut my operating short. Had fun anyway. Valid QSOs multipliers Single operator 160 9 9 80 29 15 40 74 29 20 136 40 15 85 25 10 16 10 TOTAL 349 128 349 QSOs * x 128 DXCC C; /archives//html/SECC/2001-08/msg00042.html (6,488 bytes)
58. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (w4nti@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 09:52:24 -0500; W4NTI did better than last year. 334 qso 130 mults 43420 points Found 40 to be my best band this time. With 20 the close second. I jumped on 15 and 10 from time to time and did fair on 15. Ten was de; /archives//html/SECC/2001-08/msg00068.html (6,683 bytes)
59. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 22:37:31 -0400; Hi Guys: I really enjoyed NAQP CW this weekend. I almost doubled my score from last August with only 45 more minutes operating time. Conditions must have been better and the FT1000MP may have helped; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00026.html (8,405 bytes)
60. [SECC] NAQP CW (score: 1): Author: k4ea@contesting.com (Neal Sulmeyer); Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:07:40 -0400; Johnny (K4TW) and I will most likely do multi-two for the CW NAQP. If for some reason that does not happen I will certainly do single-op and be available for a team. 73's Neal, K4EA k4ea@contesting.c; /archives//html/SECC/2000-07/msg00056.html (6,433 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3]